Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 12 December 2016 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F9212948D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:25:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qzew-IIPOQBN for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:25:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB7A12978B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 242021FCAF2; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:25:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9C7160053; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B121600B5; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id X2iEa84vu8qX; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40D0B160053; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6596A5C871B9; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:25:42 +1100 (EST)
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <B192A1B3-03FF-43D1-AD30-12BBA2D65DF0@gmail.com> <9fe0e34d-51e9-bdf3-a650-d8b3681f1cd8@bellis.me.uk> <CAPt1N1=Z2xERw68-=iFGgYYnEO3eDW-8tvhmTmaf4+vU-24grQ@mail.gmail.com> <585D7369-28A8-4B6D-BE77-C94B42CA4432@google.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:00:20 -0800." <585D7369-28A8-4B6D-BE77-C94B42CA4432@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:25:42 +1100
Message-Id: <20161212202542.6596A5C871B9@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/kmkIU2caCU-K-Rci8GqgujU1O6Y>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:25:56 -0000

In message <585D7369-28A8-4B6D-BE77-C94B42CA4432@google.com>, james woodyatt writes:
>
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the advantage
> > that the IAB controls .arpa, and so we can get an unsecure delegation
> > right away assuming the IAB agrees.   I see no reason to think they would
> > not.   It's a bit more typing, and there is the problem that the fourth
> > google result for arpa is "Advanced Research Projects Agency.   But it
> > would work, and quickly, and would keep the whole process in the family.
>
> A third available option is to obtain a new “regular” top-level domain
> for IAB to control that has a better name than “arpa.” and use that for
> the insecure delegation to the “home” subdomain.

Do you mean a new GTLD with all the baggage that entails or a special
name with a signed delegation in the root zone as apposed to a
insecure delegation or some other mechanism?

The problem with the regular GTLD process is that there is a upfront
cost and annual costs as well as a whole guide book of rules which
are inappropriate for this exercise.

The special names process reserves the name.  It is silent about
adding delegations to the root zone (secure or insecure).

Third mechanism ????

Mark

> --james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org