IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3C5129CDD for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:33:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBVWxeN0btOa for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 120F4129C7D for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f82so89723100wmf.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:33:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9Cm3s+/H+cas46/O2Je9EQe2IKZvgMEp4/jr1Nfhckg=; b=F8oR4/Z62vXMLYXspH9R4FXBTfV3gTMmsHy7VEdu0y50Hmk9bokMnfm0wNVh58o2/z gwWG/21I0vXnQudgj/YpyFD/Bzu7OA+zQ7kOK8Vxl3KyQN39q1BvOv9+1LUF2lHWBFVH mL/ECIqTBbpTKCsOIjzXhayNsx9Fd1VVxGLEIqWhoUv0pjTBoUvU8UuXTPh8lnv6e2ao 8/TEaTprjpnAANaXu4Do/HT8zg2zNHKRxfP4tyq/v6gjY9wo0hxy1YS8WzwHIyFJrxRX 2ii3eiB6GpzOBtqg7w/tYkLOGtzYBFs7ZGgnYHDV34npY8mkRnCOrEBUnKyDDeqFTaFt H6cA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9Cm3s+/H+cas46/O2Je9EQe2IKZvgMEp4/jr1Nfhckg=; b=EtL+6decMGLxRQvLi8k+VO4ljb4G8ZseZ8SEvGnfB/lbBdKXkdiK52Oi+Y5tfNKMAd 5yQMOOwEx0OkzbZpHwbKFujLm7V3t59Rr8/KuWD94KL+7j09xLLBZXG2dcZuz+gLY8wO dZz+0rEwtcnjO99J7tp1DzIA1JclH5gCof+5a2vmiSYBDqa0kC1rP6AU7wtldioWNFsf JBYLwmCEX3JNRrHVIH+VJm66Jy3FG+FcJMKqtCpcjVnqMXePRzvJvOHdl75GGi6hR+R0 O3eH79SGtWImxUdXm5k8wpnBTQPqkqvzNbxKLcwUuuxi7n3TwsJvSMFI6A8Z9MwYsrf/ B46Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00Gffd9SH8Eh/2cqxqU/RRVIHG7f9xedrpyotP0KYEMT1XOvnZBqo6pwURJTFtL7/90sRGWoUqyO3AK3w==
X-Received: by 10.25.192.20 with SMTP id q20mr31598619lff.5.1481578398393; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:33:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:32:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F256B003-68A8-4C42-9A3D-4CBD4412FD90@google.com>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <B192A1B3-03FF-43D1-AD30-12BBA2D65DF0@gmail.com> <9fe0e34d-51e9-bdf3-a650-d8b3681f1cd8@bellis.me.uk> <CAPt1N1=Z2xERw68-=iFGgYYnEO3eDW-8tvhmTmaf4+vU-24grQ@mail.gmail.com> <585D7369-28A8-4B6D-BE77-C94B42CA4432@google.com> <20161212202542.6596A5C871B9@rock.dv.isc.org> <F256B003-68A8-4C42-9A3D-4CBD4412FD90@google.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:32:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kzFZzfGxphF9Jm1wDLbGxk7OZvCMhjZHNjXtEt6bJJtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e56ee24bb7005437cda12"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/fT_FCElwf-FhdiyPZaIXoAbAIWc>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:33:24 -0000

That is not an option for this working group.   Whether or not it is a good
idea is another topic, but that option is definitely not an option for this
working group, because it is not in our charter.   If some other working
group _had already gotten_ such a TLD, then we could talk about using it,
but placing such a process in the critical path doesn't make sense.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:30 PM, james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> wrote:

> On Dec 12, 2016, at 12:25, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>
>
> Third mechanism ????
>
>
> Basically, I’m trying to point out that if you don’t like “Advanced
> Research Projects Agency” showing up in searches on the gTLD part of
> Home.gTLD when gTLD=arpa, then you can fix that whole class of problem for
> every IETF working, not just us, by obtaining a new gTLD and using a new
> subdomain of that instead. That’s the third option available. Not saying
> it’s a good one. Just that it isn’t one or the other.
>
> Get you a domain that does both: 1) puts the insecure delegation into a
> zone controlled by IAB, and 2) avoids using the confusing “arpa" gTLD.
>
>
> --james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email