IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7952A12963D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:36:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFz1bdXnczAS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFBF4129F04 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c184so5913766wmd.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:36:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Jjk2hrRYnrpVezJxAIRMgtg8fp+sN6t3gsPG0I3qWgs=; b=uKVO+Y6BsS+k0dWi5iM9ravg2CxGlhaH1txUlb6wxUaKYz7fQo0k2Yq8HVhZ90ozQh CTkj+jmuULX+OtG1lyNb+R+VM15uHD+s3/TK3yGPS8nKyYHZfZMcAnxk5GQCvPO/tsNr OBfWXBNlBoO9Ds9W2O8vNGQQ5lTrdiW+gCrQrEf3lfir54J7xlKumzNbf3BB6GSoUA1n Sh6IVtBNbKRsO1Y/f+3PJd+jqZThux5wqqJZeJf/K1FQ5eVtYRFK5Di8yhovsuO13Bc2 o1F3BdVl03IRQKOqVZQxexHaNpiMffSMs/MwYvir0SdeWdFz2gSrOKxKNz/CZpiLeQ0Y B2yA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Jjk2hrRYnrpVezJxAIRMgtg8fp+sN6t3gsPG0I3qWgs=; b=GaGukKs2+xDR2vhrPIQHxbVn2yY3O8YraEjtzkMAxbt3HeOSbyZ+S04hoq/S2cTSey APL50Q4O9MefChqTcVzy43rNQb+Q6Yz6EPyAsZ2DMU00fbNAgND3y4Gbhn9wmmUBYJmC meq2Qx1XpIaPG2/K/Cu9AUkpPFArZ6YP4iT7h0owTz8gIzBeaf92LxIpEEI0TIdFH4OE eI34JvwoyrJuc7uGjNmqsZyMWVdgjmtXQN94To2rgOG8Iy+qJmFdxIPgbgAi6Jb8nrFv IdDyMxDfy4MogWJ7ZhIVdypzAhSCd5Gd8ck8auXxHfSh0kiTj40WQk0/eYbWOFqrg0FJ MXQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01Dl7jD0lmRB8dGQ3l1F89aMV91tOhfbbFFqDj/uiiO+RGUWlWQql7UrYddffd25o725uNBJslIXt1M9A==
X-Received: by 10.25.210.147 with SMTP id j141mr565549lfg.78.1481812598078; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:36:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:35:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <CAH1iCioPZiO78j478BV7t=pTN9LZXQbweeBZQF2w3O1gKwx3XA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215011803.A2B705CE7CAA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCir6R=DG+RM1BoMn1s31x3ZoN4bHLO7dWdVL-yCD3u3R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Mw=LSQ+dwFX2MFKTzSHMzWKAMLrW9fQPaAggMb+GJ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirFZtCWVkMqFp8Fb=wJLzmBNb2k5PfxKBRNUtgVR7cMXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:35:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mwoGDuc8fn7mFd0R3cx_xQLBM3H=ye9L+ceE6kvUo-mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11411ef6886b910543b361bc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/u1vQWMMd6xUv3lYA6Fp36vQ4z3c>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:36:57 -0000

>
> Why shouldn't a iterative resolver work if we can make it work?
>

Putting an iterative resolver in a stub resolver is an attack on the DNS
infrastructure.   If you are doing it because you are testing some theory
in an experimental jig, that's perfectly fine; in that case, you are a
consenting adult, and can configure it with a special delegation for
.homenet if you need that to work.   If you are adding it to production
code that will be installed in a billion devices, you are a vandal.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email