IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Wed, 14 December 2016 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0A4129590 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:14:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1Uj6hPOmHjJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64717129EA8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBEKE0KA022671; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:14:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-Id: <201612142014.uBEKE0KA022671@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <CAPt1N1n+PcuJ+AU-6U4TFiJvjNWz1PRNNp+y=zbnMSxZVKZ57A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <E773C5B4-BA00-488C-9854-C729B671DFBD@gmail.com> <95E95A61-2079-498B-91C6-E98B50B84044@shinkuro.com> <CAPt1N1nCWgEtsMY4s669CHicWppyz9wCVYA9HR0QR_rGOPXSfA@mail.gmail.com> <CE36578B-780B-4222-B5A8-F6A252259234@shinkuro.com> <CAPt1N1n+PcuJ+AU-6U4TFiJvjNWz1PRNNp+y=zbnMSxZVKZ57A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> message dated "Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:07:20 -0500."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <22669.1481746440.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:14:00 +0100
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.1 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:14:03 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oS1OMf3DK0xwN4cNffdFMU71ufo>
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:14:38 -0000

 Ted Lemon writes:

 > I hope it was obvious that I was pretty confident that you actually had a
 > reason.   :)
 > 
 > The issue what what you are saying is that sometimes it is technically
 > correct for a name to not be validatable.   The reason we want an unsecured
 > delegation for .homenet is that .homenet can't be validated using the root
 > trust anchor, because the name is has no globally unique meaning.   So the
 > reason that you've given doesn't apply to this case, although I completely
 > agree with your reason as it applies to the case of names that are globally
 > unique.

Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something
like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa).

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email