IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Wed, 14 December 2016 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B819B1299CD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:46:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RWvD3Av9Etr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x242.google.com (mail-qk0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06DC91294BE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x242.google.com with SMTP id h201so4484665qke.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:46:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ju4/HapjMm7CW7n6ckScWMaVjMsUDM3NkJIXFd8ILFo=; b=DxdfIFCZ/t9G1H0C9ke4XmKV4LgLR59K0y9Q7ASvWA8gRTCyu9kqnOLcsTyh+chPRX vGwo1u8zrDQsbr+kkV+W2pDR4xADkpAmx2DIuEzh7HI3DWJBu0C0oRlKMovezeFE396Y hafU0jcDNaMi+zWz0MbHs8IDJBxA771F3EtxPEclpJEr/qtKkUCXdW2Lt0rR4qSmyjmP Z6gxdbWWnOuOIjTg0y+t3V/Qgovo1AuKqhs8G7rLO6Qkwu+YODAHjJG1HLMQrUCwL2/Z nOhd31v1VYjzCn01T70S366YsWDDJUayDA2ss4AaLJ62m9L57KgeCB4JSdHhRCTzm2ES xWvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ju4/HapjMm7CW7n6ckScWMaVjMsUDM3NkJIXFd8ILFo=; b=BFoML6jXwt4tZj60Il6ghQmwe62sRdUKWkISdgeGU9zpoqnKHFJXbiJREGOLdIVGoB mnnFQY7VxuX+M1YcZG4gGyPdsRXu8DuOQm7jCOVUzblmbyGXzWZKqVEmELEAPFNI+1eY Jf0+5RUpMb6CzgDJN0SzDSccFKkxE6w0kF3fdZZP6s8VxL0F6AvOwGwhzU+J/YL9L2rY b7gK1I+WAgZKuROSJT4eKWR+IRbwMrbU64JVdTqTeemK2Y3UsWnqCZxcgR/2TlApesAT y3J13Dmg+x5528rRURMtJTgQ1tFeMArERQdUf0MUVFuySwW2jgDBJEdooRFEbCgTeob5 Sa4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC0032uc3wriTPMBnTKJ9Cx8+jXUR4xiFcxqoOF/wi0J9ONDVHBnKZwN58NahOtQbwA==
X-Received: by 10.55.149.134 with SMTP id x128mr82363957qkd.263.1481744773657; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c381:c20:3cb8:e37a:8b07:d020? ([2601:181:c381:c20:3cb8:e37a:8b07:d020]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g46sm32443252qtb.44.2016.12.14.11.46.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <240f8ec3-06d2-5fe7-de29-e7e6bf37e03f@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:46:11 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A46058D-4C79-4F6A-A528-21B600EC69D7@gmail.com>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <E773C5B4-BA00-488C-9854-C729B671DFBD@gmail.com> <95E95A61-2079-498B-91C6-E98B50B84044@shinkuro.com> <CAPt1N1nCWgEtsMY4s669CHicWppyz9wCVYA9HR0QR_rGOPXSfA@mail.gmail.com> <CE36578B-780B-4222-B5A8-F6A252259234@shinkuro.com> <CAPt1N1n+PcuJ+AU-6U4TFiJvjNWz1PRNNp+y=zbnMSxZVKZ57A@mail.gmail.com> <809B3342-EB5C-4A25-B01E-D76A243FD295@shinkuro.com> <7F362774-96A8-49DD-9F89-CF3B5EE79DE2@gmail.com> <240f8ec3-06d2-5fe7-de29-e7e6bf37e03f@bellis.me.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PcznvNncZVww_bSOjyqAKiYGxbA>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:46:16 -0000

Ray,

While I can’t speak for Ralph, I also suggested that comments from DNSOP participants on these drafts should go to the HOMENET WG list, because they were input to a HOMENET WGLC.

It does seem to me that the discussion of DNSSEC, including the opposition of the chair of ICANN to an unsigned delegation in the root zone for .homenet, is input that the WG should have, but HOMENET needs to decide what to make of that input.

What’s the best way for DNS experts in DNSOP to provide input to HOMENET on these drafts in WGLC? 


thanks,
Suzanne



> On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 14/12/2016 17:24, Ralph Droms wrote:
>> Is there any way this discussion could be moved to homenet, which is
>> where the use case originates and the WG last call is taking place?
> 
> Ralph,
> 
> I think this is primarily a DNSSEC problem, and the expertise for that
> is here rather than in Homenet.
> 
> Ray
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email