IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CB81297A7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:50:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrrE4NtJiJqM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404F0129781 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a197so7579144wmd.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:50:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+lLEDBn55+uallTJTEGQ3HSX05krE+7NATfTnU5EcDI=; b=yfoH7Imd3gf4/ggcqMSdIX1CrUGUTcD/WaACo3k6qUQECeZs8z63hV8sTX3MxdK2Wx F8UhMYH39DZt64VwMTfgeINk8VhViEjml+7TnIC/OX7owXIzGn4sKGoV7gWs96IdhVGK G2jFXv4g+ZbkPtshzcIrXkoiOnHcta6eN+1BYs5jLqcAGJTsDl9N/HgYbzbd9VLE5Y4G +kxkd643i/503HYXvJ3CjjldhYU7ouVNr2/fGrGEBRAjGFZcP8mTVCjp3JQJHqFZ/3KA zxKyQ/XRWI57YQrkpZUYjblwlEzFdZbcaFngB7UtX/wNpJhs9HEZ2FMTcq3WGWn1IFfM ZP+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+lLEDBn55+uallTJTEGQ3HSX05krE+7NATfTnU5EcDI=; b=b7zxall8rmYRA5tE+85Xze8hX+LR+KAbCAMsO7MbjB8+UOqi//LfwLO0X0uLzHuI/y Z5swZFDCWStQAszzIanZCE0PoAgxwjFw0dXd/xNDN1YbXczeBvTSM5F+2QTsM/8YBZpx Zgch5utGAh3KKUqK25ISs3oMQg+kWZe2BoIv6Sf4irhHtiLvINd/E4eESv//KfvwXrcf WWYSJVcZp80/3cFGGd3iqgdj1zSR628i15XxRP1iQ3d3yPgsG9mt9FLuem1i2TmyU1Tw EZa51W9DHLW4zUN88tYk4ZGBL4n6FRhAwxRjdbKA2+M4E712mi51KS1uD7NPPVZAthhw vRZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC0215D0KyzZ802YBfeaiwqOfeP9rZmqram33ul6BRWDQNq1PSwhpv2aaUGK4w9pDdeJGFNFy7mq6oHLruw==
X-Received: by 10.25.23.25 with SMTP id n25mr1208905lfi.152.1481842251661; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:50:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:50:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C059877D829F76429F49E0B48705D888F7FD3D67@EXCH-01.CORP.CIRA.CA>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <B192A1B3-03FF-43D1-AD30-12BBA2D65DF0@gmail.com> <9fe0e34d-51e9-bdf3-a650-d8b3681f1cd8@bellis.me.uk> <CAPt1N1=Z2xERw68-=iFGgYYnEO3eDW-8tvhmTmaf4+vU-24grQ@mail.gmail.com> <C059877D829F76429F49E0B48705D888F7FD2C7B@EXCH-01.CORP.CIRA.CA> <4A870505-070B-4065-B360-5A98485E4CEB@fugue.com> <313759CF-B72F-401D-BA26-79C214C30686@shinkuro.com> <8D7E8E5C-EC8E-46E9-9C07-947D7A7F69E3@fugue.com> <61ebc3c3-557a-1be8-7205-648e1e83411c@nthpermutation.com> <3E04D8BB-D18F-4D9B-81C3-991BCF76FBE7@fugue.com> <C059877D829F76429F49E0B48705D888F7FD3D67@EXCH-01.CORP.CIRA.CA>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:50:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=sja40SS9_TyFV9vqASXTd1j-vMC+A31ggjG=-vU0W2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacques Latour <jacques.latour@cira.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114064e40617fb0543ba4922"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/N-JN2mymH-Z1hghbYKWMaM2Rf0U>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:50:56 -0000

It would also make it not work for any client, and it would be in direct
contradiction to advice this working group published less than a year ago.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Jacques Latour <jacques.latour@cira.ca>
wrote:

> This would probably a good use case for homenet to use its own DNS class,
> Class 2 - 0x0002 – Homenet (HN). How to implement is beyond my paygrade.
>
> This would make homenet DNS very distinctive, which it is.
>
>
>
> If we want to solve this problem, it’s going to require an extension to
> the DNS that provides a way to mark zones of this sort.   I would be more
> willing to fall on this sword if we actually got more security out of it,
> but I don’t think we do.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email