IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0794C12975C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:09:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWKflGo80Rkv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E719129530 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g23so140359598wme.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:09:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=byKIXhjVtPLUHw/Bgznr1a1m/soOoxxY47NPQCyPEc8=; b=j3hWHkO5x9OZ/5qFMqZ713QHl6GX/ZZYZ5MwdX7nl+MYd58rNc+4YuOeHVU1wQjI63 QmEIw6WU7pw3S3CRHymI2wM0Oj8SENB/QfegouYbj1QaSzIIMAvYnblDvHmcFJFickdt w5N+VDTagZlqnaIHETj+3nbp6lITTlOXtQqFFrkWJ8BgLAMMQbi2nB++G5ZF3Poirzo3 4HThJWQpinjuiu+Jc37unUI77HA7vnjElCydk4NKpHkbNGmZ9jgGRVbyUYX/FVMdnCnx nDe8jwyjROqh+4IRS2O0rj96ToSra1GU51LnohWM1mhuWX2eeurP324PI76DPSnVAI+q KhSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=byKIXhjVtPLUHw/Bgznr1a1m/soOoxxY47NPQCyPEc8=; b=nz4AoD5Vyf/sv53QCWnAyMchYgU7UIKIIcsUh3HVw3mXtFMXCuQn65vKPYF48zsQ5V qIyQj3zHWzUUfxm0qAGVZxoQFbVDgzjgdsSOx62YAFlFxPOPKc/DigyqSLzGYlMxqmHK Mx3havTVWBsVOJ1dOjeCklU+DFGFt4bf/UWlqXyDVCLkfVBpT0Fz2p7ccfgr0bmQrA2M BKhozkVJDPHj/nZxyMnE95OxariLZ9ZYxQAWU3oYa1EX8aG0f92iNDj7OKFRT6JWysL1 vUtyzWFUt1sGGzwmU5Ter4kHYOkVqfTZK2NFwWxWxhhxZPXzpBjwIxBTwyFPPkvDuX+1 jDxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC030ZuWKF4oLjqKpYS6qMz7QLANIUoVp0aDKl+aCSo2r9CpbCQiJXNlHeBF2tGJ1LIbp+4eh421SGXa8KQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.192.20 with SMTP id q20mr35568868lff.5.1481764167046; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:09:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:08:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612141948330.4133@ary.qy>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612141948330.4133@ary.qy>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:08:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mRh9kk_dc21eBTVx0iJaY6G2f_3cMxLP7WSvGGhc+Frw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e56eed1a12a0543a81a8d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/hcqKZ9Xr8lqBJKpHnYXbccRVfB4>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:09:31 -0000

It solves the problem of not repudiating names in the homenet.   You have
to have a special resolver to be able to validate them.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:48 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> But it's worse than that -- if your client software does DNSSEC
>>> validation it needs to understand that homenet is a special case and
>>> it's OK not to validate.
>>> [etc]
>>>
>>
>> That is precisely why we need an unsecured delegation.
>>
>
> Except that as the [etc] said, it doesn't really solve the problem.
>
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email