IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF in July

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275FA3A0D68 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puHEn2Ktp60E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25EB43A0D31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EF4F8266E; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:43:01 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: IETF in July
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org> <1966.1585066127@localhost> <20200324165522.GB15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <fd607d65-3fe5-fb9a-2fac-57a3d1f442b5@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:42:56 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200324165522.GB15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-7KpST9CaHOwgeedYlBhfHG4kjA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:43:08 -0000

On 24/3/20 13:55, Toerless Eckert wrote:
[...]
> 
> I think it would also be good to create a
> "pay what you think is appropriate" for remote attendants,
> maybe even with a bit of public shaming by publishing this
> in the attendance list.

I have no idea the principles under which, in a situation where there's 
individual vs. corporate and funded vs. non-funded and participation 
from countries with totally different economic situations and currency 
exchange rates, such a list could be a data source for "shaming"...

Talk about diversity....

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email