IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF in July

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 20 March 2020 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141523A0E5F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOfByJCSDO4J for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49EA43A0E7D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.147] (p548DCD70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.205.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48kbT82C89zyYc; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:48:12 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: IETF in July
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:48:11 +0100
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 606430091.876297-603a123e2f870475f80e332b9c1e5fc4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iE99orvCKQWYxqMWkUlj0LPsDLs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:48:43 -0000

On 2020-03-20, at 21:42, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
>  
> Is anybody planning contingencies for a fully remote IETF in July? (I don’t mean to be a pessimist, but planning for a worst-case scenario is never a bad idea).

I personally believe there is not more than a 5 % chance of the physical meeting actually taking place.  I would *love* to be surprised.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email