Re: IETF in July
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 23 March 2020 16:32 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61523A0C16 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjxJ-A32Vsq2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EFC3A0867 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24CB8809C1; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:32:23 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: IETF in July
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org> <37205051-dab1-d59e-5fb2-fbcef327302b@nostrum.com> <CAJc3aaMFdyYxeX_6bZCmOJ8q8KBaHYmV79N70O85dHZ3AWUcaA@mail.gmail.com> <50BB2CE9-DEFC-4269-8FDC-ACA708FC5BE5@gmail.com> <0E824A81-B9ED-485C-9183-84C17CECFD88@consulintel.es>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <2ec8a9b7-f364-a621-1d88-c1cfa51a8aba@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:31:37 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0E824A81-B9ED-485C-9183-84C17CECFD88@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U10flO5HLMosDttzhR6_lI3r2ws>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:32:56 -0000
On 23/3/20 12:47, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > It all depends on how smart are our governments. If they seriously > confine the people, we will get to normal earlier. It's not just government. It's government + people. And for obvious reason, that's a distributed problem that is non-trivial to address. > The economic impact will be much lower for all. Lockdown implies that the economy is essentially stopped. I don't think we'll have less than 1-month lockdown. And where it hasn't started, it'll get worse (peeking at current flights might me an unfortunate of spread, even at larger scale. e.g., as of today, there seem to be flights virtually everywhere: https://www.flightradar24.com/- > If a country decides to ignore that, then is fine to avoid travelers from that country. Are you assuming that Spain will ban countries if they don't react according to some standards? On what basis? > I’m not saying that until there is an efficient vaccine, we will get 0 > impact with more Covid19 infections, but not at the level that we > congest our health systems and disallow traveling. This is what we have at the time of this writing. And I understand that we do protocols, not epidemiology. > Doing that more than > a couple of months will be really bad for every economy, supply chains > and that means citizens. We can’t (and must not) stop the world. It seems that what WHO et al are advocating is "stay home", except for essential services (normally food, health, fuel, security/police, high ranks at government, and not a lot more) > We must get to normal as fast as we can, and the only way is > confinement. I was not believing on that originally, but now it is clear > to me. We don't control this. And the number of flights on https://www.flightradar24.com/ suggests that people don't even stay in their cities. Unless lockdown is *enforced*, you're just "hoping". [...] > Despite that, I still think we are talking about this too early. I think > we need to wait until around May-June. That implies that people should wait till about a month before the IETF to make the necessary arrangements. Besides, that not only implies that the crazyness is over (I wished, but I'm not that optimistic), but also that individuals and companies gor their own stuff in order to be allowed/able to travel to e.g. attend a meeting. Not to mention that with all the cancellations that have occurred (and that probably will for some time), when flights get back to "normal", demand and prices might be interesting. As much as I would like this crazyness to be over, I can't be as optimistic as you. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- IETF in July Ron Bonica
- Re: IETF in July Jared Mauch
- Re: IETF in July Keith Moore
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF in July Fred Baker
- Re: IETF in July Job Snijders
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Tim Wicinski
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF in July Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF in July Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July Adam Roach
- Re: IETF in July Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF in July Stewart Bryant
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Adam Roach
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF in July Michael Speer
- Re: IETF in July Alissa Cooper
- Re: IETF in July Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July John Levine
- Re: IETF in July John C Klensin
- Re: IETF in July Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF in July Ross Finlayson
- Re: IETF in July Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Randy Presuhn
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Clint Chaplin
- Re: IETF in July Rich Kulawiec
- RE: IETF in July Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Rich Kulawiec
- Re: IETF in July John Scudder
- Re: IETF in July Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF in July Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF in July Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF in July Bajpai, Vaibhav