IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF in July

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Fri, 20 March 2020 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975663A0EAB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNk2gj9TnJ2E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11313A0EA8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id m3so7963709wmi.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=SoE8uZqUrF+ykpFehD2NcATLx7FI8DtYVSaLNNVT5Lk=; b=ZtKEE7gOb+EXulMnTRFtYc2yLklszJJyEJb1/9TYTi8sDm2I73UNNqCS9jgjwVZCJI pc3ibSpXCChaFpNhklW2/LbUTtF1zCBoCcaTTmfAG+dNraqizkZjSi1NKOyBKUP0tCcR WKpTs5UTG9Go4V0aWDE77nWdgY67wsgs/gx4q6DhjrVT8yufHHJ/eEuF0LMDEfzlYKwE sETLf0BQqpLdUxAoNli/1jfxT8VKtb9nf78/NCOSnzpMJilUz0xyUWPsCmZH9nnMh893 GEZpE9+zu7kVMP7aRqNGqU99knAz6OchjrPsnljLEt9fgAJun4h1PB7KLLR4PY5KZgER l2EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ21B7FUZTBh2oiNrvZCJl/rUThgHD+hRsNqhJWWxLz59FbKDRJe k5ja4R56mV57VwED3mtYAsnToHsoLsY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt4juBsi3j6cd8DyYcLE3mM3V9Tdyd+vwr7iGWGk9Vw2TFJeWmi0jeuAWqZEXBfHSlUkvaQCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4342:: with SMTP id q63mr13412827wma.137.1584739625692; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vurt.meerval.net (vurt.meerval.net. [192.147.168.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10sm9196959wml.44.2020.03.20.14.27.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vurt.meerval.net [local]) by vurt.meerval.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id bf6e5c2f; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:27:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:27:03 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF in July
Message-ID: <20200320212703.GG17523@vurt.meerval.net>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_OF2AFKNb5KpdkBYxFs3br4veug>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:27:11 -0000

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:48:11PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-03-20, at 21:42, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > Is anybody planning contingencies for a fully remote IETF in July?
> > (I don’t mean to be a pessimist, but planning for a worst-case
> > scenario is never a bad idea).
> 
> I personally believe there is not more than a 5 % chance of the
> physical meeting actually taking place.  I would *love* to be
> surprised.

I think assuming the July IETF will not take place in physical group
meeting form has multiple advantages: operating under the assumption
that it will not take place will satisfy both the formulation of a
proper contingency plan, and a much needed reconsideration of how it is
that we meet and work towards our purpose.

In some ways I look forward to an in-depth exploration of what it means
to really only use the Internet to build the Internet. :-)

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email