Re: IETF in July

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 March 2020 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54483A0EAB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yAEDJvbymV-a for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CCA3A0DC5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id d63so8101408oig.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EbQW/NfxiSFj2CKwdBQp4Tq794JjoeWXW3LstPvkcUc=; b=mSF/lGIUjKxPrF3qj+HqcvP+X+W9LAQJsZwrI8AYSeI7T6BJ6AnV4OCcljOQt64uI+ nfzPokk3tjLNkWunrm/iiEChzG0qqkz20SipZDSy/pQezatIa+bsrdFJXqtTXW/nsjQq mTSqEwXusOC6lLbJWwrS2k+SKK9mivnUKTSVYn5eGGe/bt53CUPArOpt2NfIeraxIvY9 6JOj5pwSkxGhXJP72A4qZVExwrtIWWNwgjbQmDaLkshv1i45rBohMzzsuEn2X9irlbCN A9rJaUozcim7mvoxOpyhHVjnnCMaHBO6Sai4LdJwD+xDNmcmWZ0Rd0s6vDG3nyGMGG1f k/YA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EbQW/NfxiSFj2CKwdBQp4Tq794JjoeWXW3LstPvkcUc=; b=fmo/IoW0ArhE72WBz6yfPKXdHqm1x4HkDC3Y+4xJs9zLaHyRVVy4R16ouaP090lW8b 7VzDI4JJp5Yqu8HRjYMqsfxqpaqT7tzFDvBsBdHr20IYdA6Hps8mzUGh1f/zoRxUOsNR w/wWZB9eSwWcfKckT9jsM6ZseHLSYJDTJPsR6+qc1PaOmvjY3U1oHDxEQQgBU4p8Pbmz erR2hL5ek5ZzzcWZBDyq/SNlF/n814csLXYRBVOaQRwzTo4/c5S2LTJlbP0V0314YxSl 2JruUIfj30YWP4E1cjdCojGLStAB62/6PLeFpnlGgBONnCo0pOXSDcdKxn2GXH36aI4d uHow==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2IEz2hAQ0NU/VlwEHFIZzoW0EvxBIZ4GI8WP9WMV0w0fV4i3Hl oz9VvCMA+wysDaPm1oGzXezykiuMD2XRC0X9QoE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtrn9FYkwIzSvCWfrwxjbOQzwcEK+/QNMcJTJOn6t+hpl/MoJD48vgqmnFpDGC0/aq6MZcLaJzbOxeY3SLfmMQ=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:cc0c:: with SMTP id c12mr8366511oig.6.1584739970236; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <1AAA027D-2EF1-4087-BBDB-E4C2BF564A36@puck.nether.net> <CAMm+LwiymYoPmiGvSNxmmmSMe+UGye5YtPrvKAf6ay49sb2DuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiymYoPmiGvSNxmmmSMe+UGye5YtPrvKAf6ay49sb2DuQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:32:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FppGxAGum0aT0BgC0BUV3qYQaX6-0+2Lw7knCmkhG+ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF in July
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fcc27f05a1500679"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CDP8sFycJixPbZUdJaUz6PunYmI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:32:53 -0000

>From CNBC earlier today:

Spain official warns 80% of people in Madrid will get coronavirus, as
nationwide death toll surpasses 1,000
<https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/20/coronavirus-spain-warns-80percent-of-people-in-madrid-will-get-infected.html>

Yes, we should start planning now


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:31 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>> Ron,
>>
>> Might I suggest we get through the next week first? :-)
>>
>> I’ll wait to see the hotel announcement like everyone else, which I
>> presume won’t be sent until travel normalizes, since many international
>> borders are closed.
>>
>
> I strongly suggest that for purposes of planning WG work, everyone assume
> there won't be an in person IETF for the rest of the year unless we hear
> otherwise.
>
> It is highly unlikely that travel bans will be lifted in a sufficient
> number of countries to make any IETF viable in July and Madrid is
> reportedly a hot spot. If the secretariat announces registrations are open
> then we can rethink. Spain just reported 104 deaths in 24 hours. The chance
> that Madrid is going to be in a state to receive visitors in 17 weeks is
> really small.
>
> So don't blow off the virtual meetings assuming there will be a 'proper'
> IETF in July. Not unless you are ok with work being delayed for up to a
> year.
>
>