Re: IETF in July
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Fri, 20 March 2020 23:16 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=1348727322=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26193A0F73 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUxEtbg3P7xQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DB73A0F95 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1584746193; x=1585350993; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=9axQPdiq BIM5OMfqFLwqYKdtUaT6Qo2xW9Nbu+Q5xv4=; b=QaEcCwzXlTmiMQ5dgs3XR6PW Icc016R/edECT3iUz+eFE5zOaPGVve8iQZnCOQ72Nw/vQ+AuaMygiN+TXmXwLOO0 O5OcbRf1N/ogKkwDth0mNj2OnOOphkql+VW5ZtW5gNZZuL/3a1dl6nNSF6Mj7ADe pAgJSFFcqR9dqm9gF0c=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:16:33 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:16:32 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.130] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000098071.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:16:31 +0100
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:e5bd:b953:2c7f:e5b2
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.130]
X-MDArrival-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:16:31 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1348727322=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:16:29 +0100
Subject: Re: IETF in July
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: IETF in July
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gv-pdwMBOBoq76VWISrBMYlgG64>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:17:08 -0000
The confinement in Spain is for one more week (started one week ago already), but I predict that will be extended 2 more weeks and I think is the right thing to do now. May be even 3-4 weeks (so in total 1.5 months). I will like to be optimist at the time being, especially after having taken 20 years to organize it in Madrid! I think it all depends on what is the status by mid-April, maximum end of April, and not just in Spain. If this confinement works in Spain, and other countries (especially those which have participants of IETF), also do a similar 1-2 months confinement NOW, then borders could reopen and everything should be fine by end of May. I think the decision should be taken at that point. However, if any country is not doing the confinement, I will say, that country is going to be banned by the other countries, in order to avoid the Covid19 coming back. The situation in Spain has been worst because the government has not taken the right decision: 1) Initially they brought back from China Spanish citizens and quarantined them mandatorily. Fine! 2) However, surprisingly, when was clear that in Italy was widely spread, they didn't take any measurements to ask for mandatory quarantine for those coming from Italy. *Crazy and irrational* no sense compared to 1. Instead, countries from Africa and LAC, since the very early stages, have closed the borders to citizens from all over EU (and China). China itself is doing now the same. I'm convinced now that this is the right way to stop a wider spread. Regarding the situation in Spain, I'm sure that by the next week or so, we will reach the peak, with about 35.000-40.000 infected and probably 5.000 deaths (right now is about 1.100) and then will start going down very quickly if the confinement continues for 1-2 more weeks. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 20/3/20 21:50, "ietf en nombre de Carsten Bormann" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de cabo@tzi.org> escribió: On 2020-03-20, at 21:42, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Folks, > > Is anybody planning contingencies for a fully remote IETF in July? (I don’t mean to be a pessimist, but planning for a worst-case scenario is never a bad idea). I personally believe there is not more than a 5 % chance of the physical meeting actually taking place. I would *love* to be surprised. Grüße, Carsten ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- IETF in July Ron Bonica
- Re: IETF in July Jared Mauch
- Re: IETF in July Keith Moore
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF in July Fred Baker
- Re: IETF in July Job Snijders
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Tim Wicinski
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF in July Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF in July Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July Adam Roach
- Re: IETF in July Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF in July Stewart Bryant
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Adam Roach
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF in July Michael Speer
- Re: IETF in July Alissa Cooper
- Re: IETF in July Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July John Levine
- Re: IETF in July John C Klensin
- Re: IETF in July Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF in July Ross Finlayson
- Re: IETF in July Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Randy Presuhn
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Clint Chaplin
- Re: IETF in July Rich Kulawiec
- RE: IETF in July Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Rich Kulawiec
- Re: IETF in July John Scudder
- Re: IETF in July Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF in July Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF in July Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF in July Bajpai, Vaibhav