Re: IETF in July
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 19:17 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FA73A0C4A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QsYAiQTpnjkw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD543A0C63 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1jGp2x-000NDt-1k; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:17:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:17:01 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF in July
Message-ID: <070A64E8B7884BA0BCD93172@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <fd607d65-3fe5-fb9a-2fac-57a3d1f442b5@si6networks.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org> <1966.1585066127@localhost> <20200324165522.GB15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <fd607d65-3fe5-fb9a-2fac-57a3d1f442b5@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wPTFzYY7T60Tj3sxjPyRoRN292Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:17:30 -0000
--On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 15:42 -0300 Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote: > I have no idea the principles under which, in a situation > where there's individual vs. corporate and funded vs. > non-funded and participation from countries with totally > different economic situations and currency exchange rates, > such a list could be a data source for "shaming"... > > Talk about diversity.... Which is why those of us who often participate (as distinct from observing/ listening in) remotely and who have argued, for some years, for a fee have suggested some reasonably small fixed fee and a mechanism for individuals quietly and privately asking for a waiver when the fee would be a hardship ... approximately the same mechanism that has applied to registration fees for in-person meetings for a very long time. If people want to make additional contributions, see John Levine's recent note. It is not clear to me that trying to shame either other is ever going to be a good approach in this community. best, john
- IETF in July Ron Bonica
- Re: IETF in July Jared Mauch
- Re: IETF in July Keith Moore
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF in July Fred Baker
- Re: IETF in July Job Snijders
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Tim Wicinski
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF in July Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF in July Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July Adam Roach
- Re: IETF in July Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF in July Stewart Bryant
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF in July Adam Roach
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF in July Michael Speer
- Re: IETF in July Alissa Cooper
- Re: IETF in July Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July John Levine
- Re: IETF in July John C Klensin
- Re: IETF in July Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF in July Ross Finlayson
- Re: IETF in July Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF in July Randy Presuhn
- Re: IETF in July Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF in July Clint Chaplin
- Re: IETF in July Rich Kulawiec
- RE: IETF in July Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: IETF in July Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF in July Rich Kulawiec
- Re: IETF in July John Scudder
- Re: IETF in July Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF in July Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF in July Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF in July Bajpai, Vaibhav