Re: IETF in July

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FA73A0C4A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QsYAiQTpnjkw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD543A0C63 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1jGp2x-000NDt-1k; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:17:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:17:01 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF in July
Message-ID: <070A64E8B7884BA0BCD93172@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <fd607d65-3fe5-fb9a-2fac-57a3d1f442b5@si6networks.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org> <1966.1585066127@localhost> <20200324165522.GB15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <fd607d65-3fe5-fb9a-2fac-57a3d1f442b5@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wPTFzYY7T60Tj3sxjPyRoRN292Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:17:30 -0000


--On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 15:42 -0300 Fernando Gont
<fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> I have no idea the principles under which, in a situation
> where there's individual vs. corporate and funded vs.
> non-funded and participation from countries with totally
> different economic situations and currency exchange rates,
> such a list could be a data source for "shaming"...
> 
> Talk about diversity....

Which is why those of us who often participate (as distinct from
observing/ listening in) remotely and who have argued, for some
years, for a fee have suggested some reasonably small fixed fee
and a mechanism for individuals quietly and privately asking for
a waiver when the fee would be a hardship ... approximately the
same mechanism that has applied to registration fees for
in-person meetings for a very long time.   If people want to
make additional contributions, see John Levine's recent note.  

It is not clear to me that trying to shame either other is ever
going to be a good approach in this community.

best,
  john