Re: IETF in July

Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu> Wed, 25 March 2020 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721013A0813 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtw85dK1CpdH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D79E3A0860 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id j10so150748pfi.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3ojdj6CwVnScyU0mS2yGfA5IwULQ5hMxeam0QYGh3I=; b=tTSabFf9dg+9O/MAtz0Gx6ENXQjb0TtR3xXCLKu8xXntcawqagoiJsAldwJ6SJ+f71 PlfAaAPvOcpGPRH2l9d+mc0v5abidUrGShz3iAMT9xxKoMYqyh6o4KhZiTcG41EEl0eT SFTnBGiTMeJR8vAAgFs7YVnZnDLPbPGDanEMvZxDjRtO4WpOlXYE6d/9VwqjGWPI3mEF v7SfAHJ3pyCn9moeUcyuWChouMkZx9IT1dl/oegHQTt9CHHt8dH5qicFux4kNkUxVHPt 09RsGH6c2JCRt/ubO8UrHH+k3gBKl9DubAyoPAWHb+DIuoDbP5h3oBnABXi7g8m19UI5 UEvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2xnvyzkUeIY8sHjDt68gcjMzxmM/rOPsv1KZIgOTJXMF6/y8xl TXtFZnO6yChKYx2tF7WoMrcT9X4RqwY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvwEXN3Q3SEvROejkXDPN4scvtLFCJ7kIJLKCNoovyzyAcDrxAAgl05RGLNl6th7Rqx7jVryg==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:53c5:: with SMTP id z5mr516669pgr.0.1585096672509; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-73-231-235-186.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.231.235.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm17244874pfg.177.2020.03.24.17.37.51 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF in July
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <fd607d65-3fe5-fb9a-2fac-57a3d1f442b5@si6networks.com> <20200324185217.8EA57167958E@ary.qy> <20200325003159.GE15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <fbd8b639-4b1b-6412-096f-3fc0e385df36@alumni.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:37:54 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200325003159.GE15802@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-YsSzhsIoShLxwZpde5hn2_kDOI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 00:38:13 -0000

Hi -

On 3/24/2020 5:31 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
...
> Hmm.. interesting. Does this mean a scheme where everybody would be
> freely giving conributions instead of meeting registration fees would
> be potentially quite tax advantageous for US participants ?
> Or is there some part that would make such an approach not legal ?

In the US, if you receive some tangible benefit in return for
a donation (e.g. you get fed at a benefit dinner) you must
subtract the value of what you receive from the amount of the
donation before deducting it.

Randy