IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF in July

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 23 March 2020 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D3A3A0810 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21ws2rTy-zHU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569B83A080E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.121.48] (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02NEC2ME076724 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:12:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1584972723; bh=mqSVZk3M6IcqNoJD0APE23SkXlJ7IvmNZBrrZkHPON4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=YHrhtP8fjJINaxkOXwW9gn2y/gRlzQHnFflL+LICljMcas9DPwGK/AcAznn3+NkxF GmWcM1rw03Og+uVGTidK/QPBWjikG9sazVn3zlMD+fnbBUWC0O3iaaacWPdAgifohL nSZBTUCWznwUxkJnoOAoMfCauT6WzE9GUrg1QUxs=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be [172.17.121.48]
Subject: Re: IETF in July
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <37205051-dab1-d59e-5fb2-fbcef327302b@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:11:56 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QnCrrYPxwPfXyAii0BWyQq7CPS0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:12:09 -0000

On 3/23/2020 1:28 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> Actually, I’m more and more convinced that we can make it without the need of canceling.
> For those who didn’t see yet that the light at the end of the tunnel is the light of an oncoming train:
>
> The impending postponement of the Olympics (which would have been starting the same week) should lay these thoughts to a final rest.


More to the point: what might plausibly change in the next four months 
that would reduce the need to restrict movement?

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email