Re: IETF in July

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 23 March 2020 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1351221cb6=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED73A0C61 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmdZNaMQm5CT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F02A3A0C60 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1584982348; x=1585587148; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=2l4tRt18 ntknL1RXpKWlFwyI1tgTyaIJxE5vz2wQqQQ=; b=O9+PzFbsaBdWxbTPsNNf24yu eioKxXoCR71MFL/SCrlEw2lgYXbx6WVKODE4im0WBG8C/j2bzQpUtD77chmDkQsW SmdsUJmWU5/WqYr30wCXIge7XXdl/teRUOW9SeOMHLAd2+EIt+LxJBhDZ9HIGwzU 791d3ZThKZ2L68Aw9/s=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:52:28 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:52:28 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.144] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000100982.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:52:26 +0100
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:a5fc:8d00:9739:8928
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.144]
X-MDArrival-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:52:26 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1351221cb6=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:52:24 +0100
Subject: Re: IETF in July
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <08570910-FAB3-4F3A-BB52-CD9495F8C1B3@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: IETF in July
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2E3DFE67-85D0-4259-85D5-09FF9A262B48@tzi.org> <B28C7981-1AF4-4299-AAA0-4ABA667D81B4@consulintel.es> <CAOj+MMHROy2UA7YUdRrTM240nQY4ykbYHtFME87FPznNDMdcUQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B0BBC48-1504-4847-85B1-36700873D78E@consulintel.es> <5134FD38-F675-4E81-8C57-1EBCBE475705@tzi.org> <37205051-dab1-d59e-5fb2-fbcef327302b@nostrum.com> <CAJc3aaMFdyYxeX_6bZCmOJ8q8KBaHYmV79N70O85dHZ3AWUcaA@mail.gmail.com> <50BB2CE9-DEFC-4269-8FDC-ACA708FC5BE5@gmail.com> <0E824A81-B9ED-485C-9183-84C17CECFD88@consulintel.es> <2ec8a9b7-f364-a621-1d88-c1cfa51a8aba@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <2ec8a9b7-f364-a621-1d88-c1cfa51a8aba@si6networks.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7utTkm32f1MW-x0tJI6HQCIJL9w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:52:44 -0000

Hi Fernando,


El 23/3/20 17:35, "ietf en nombre de Fernando Gont" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de fgont@si6networks.com> escribió:

    On 23/3/20 12:47, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > It all depends on how smart are our governments. If they seriously 
    > confine the people, we will get to normal earlier. 
    
    It's not just government. It's government + people. And for obvious 
    reason, that's a distributed problem that is non-trivial to address.
    
In some countries, government mandate is obeyed by most of the people ...
    
    > The economic impact will be much lower for all. 
    
    Lockdown implies that the economy is essentially stopped. I don't think 
    we'll have less than 1-month lockdown. And where it hasn't started, 
    it'll get worse (peeking at current flights might me an unfortunate of 
    spread, even at larger scale. e.g., as of today, there seem to be 
    flights virtually everywhere: https://www.flightradar24.com/-
    
There are different ways to do that confinement. I think the way is being done in Spain is sufficient. I saw in the TV news that people in NY is still going sport in parks. That's not a good way I believe.    
    
    > If a country decides to ignore that, then is fine to avoid travelers from that country.
    
    Are you assuming that Spain will ban countries if they don't react 
    according to some standards? On what basis?
    
Not just Spain, it is *right now* an EU order. All the EU borders are closed to non-citizens/residents for a month. This may be extended if needed for specific time or specific countries, according to the explanations provided. There is no need to setup worldwide standards on this. The EU will take their own decision, the same way any other country does. The difference is that in this case it is a group of 27 countries (and some others that follow the same indications by their own). 
    
    
    
    > I’m not saying that until there is an efficient vaccine, we will get 0 
    > impact with more Covid19 infections, but not at the level that we 
    > congest our health systems and disallow traveling.
    
    This is what we have at the time of this writing. And I understand that 
    we do protocols, not epidemiology.
    
    
    
    > Doing that more than 
    > a couple of months will be really bad for every economy, supply chains 
    > and that means citizens. We can’t (and must not) stop the world.
    
    It seems that what WHO et al are advocating is "stay home", except for 
    essential services (normally food, health, fuel, security/police, high 
    ranks at government, and not a lot more)
    
Exactly. Work from home if you can. Don't work outside of home unless is essential. For example, Airbus, HP and many other industries in Spain have stopped for a few days, implemented security measures to avoid spreading the virus, but they are going to work back now to manufacture "respirators" which are needed to keep people live as they don't have sufficient in the existing intensive care units. Other industries have been producing masks, and alcohol industries have started to produce pharmaceutical alcohol and other disinfectants.
    
    > We must get to normal as fast as we can, and the only way is 
    > confinement. I was not believing on that originally, but now it is clear 
    > to me.
    
    We don't control this. And the number of flights on 
    https://www.flightradar24.com/ suggests that people don't even stay in 
    their cities. Unless lockdown is *enforced*, you're just "hoping".
    
    
    
    [...]
    > Despite that, I still think we are talking about this too early. I think 
    > we need to wait until around May-June. 
    
    That implies that people should wait till about a month before the IETF 
    to make the necessary arrangements. Besides, that not only implies that 
    the crazyness is over (I wished, but I'm not that optimistic), but also 
    that individuals and companies gor their own stuff in order to be 
    allowed/able to travel to e.g. attend a meeting. Not to mention that 
    with all the cancellations that have occurred (and that probably will 
    for some time), when flights get back to "normal", demand and prices 
    might be interesting.

In this case I don't have my flight to Madrid, obviously, but many folks may have already booked it. The airlines have canceled flights for 1-2 months (including March), but it looks like at the moment, if you have a May-June-July flight, is still up. This is my own case with several airlines. None is yet cancelled, so I will not need to rebook and I guess some folks coming to IETF108 may also have their flights booked already.
    
    As much as I would like this crazyness to be over, I can't be as 
    optimistic as you.
    
    Thanks,
    -- 
    Fernando Gont
    SI6 Networks
    e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
    PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
    
    
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.