IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 09 June 2016 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C27412D8F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id APdx-hYJSK-Q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E457012D13E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id ec8so15648336pac.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d11z96cG0GSyJal9z41z4G+RCGDJE3AociHxpAilNZ8=; b=CPY+AW/2dGReEWtViQEjz2l/DKBiXepFC4DHMpm7hTQXMD+VUSPi0wU6Cw6JaLIdAG HmjEZpLQOnjMJW9hsQgmUxbcPUJ3dk5nDilzAWvA/elYL066tL5bZdl6sSeEc4sE3NDN udnhMm+gx92XrI74x2AJx0rQhplYL5KWntF9tXLwh8namTWR02IOi/TpQAoySELTTkCo 3I+1w3hTRvOq4tAfJ7cMAyIIMYlnZsqRyp1by2lVMYZrDUiddeDsKQOupx0oopUogsgo Zu27VVIo8qa+k40rHSxEySzMLfHmGd+6KVqQtZmvweVSTyOBl40wOgAE0YOfTFTh2Wr8 avuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d11z96cG0GSyJal9z41z4G+RCGDJE3AociHxpAilNZ8=; b=F3J4aotdMnVHfSOITC+2nlJ6THRU1CmM5ZE0n/9gLs6NQeYT9POx2LVs9vL5KXy/vs tvL2pf/cF+4UD0Hv+FshLLp9TgKkQ6V7jP4taudau7v6M955VrHaXpB7zsGn985/V/+m us3fpPMBAObibOJe5YUdoikkxIAnfW6pZKOjl6uP6Itiy/wqWwHfvYNFbNrv62xvnv46 7szjIvT7fCBWBq6pBqXwjxI46a6H4MvxFqhA5XkkHfIYO7sm0RSE1ytA6QavW6SNkK8M bupptZ4/6L3yKwhTPivovfIPjuOe7io2kK/25Py88xDQQQEPmMhKu7O9+PMrhSfY8rfp JH7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIqu9Vo0i6erHNG+81qj3H1wwVS9LkBTmH/Aizi0jnD2KmwL6w7JwuE8OX1brr6lg==
X-Received: by 10.66.159.163 with SMTP id xd3mr13938371pab.23.1465497577173; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (66-230-108-1-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.108.1]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g86sm11713414pfd.67.2016.06.09.11.39.36 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <256CE0D6-1A2A-459A-9800-FAF1960EDD09@consulintel.es> <D6E8D8D5-EB54-412C-9620-A8A3B2EC674B@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcewGyG3hTy4vPzuu69mznXOC-gMrODQefUqscqfwKwKTg@mail.gmail.com> <82901186-58D0-4C71-9562-57F90DFCE0CF@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcfia-boXPGGa-8ioh-Tcg4pdEnuH2C+=e7swE2g1c2ZTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cd3058b4-28f7-59d2-1596-cdf8c6ea359e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:39:34 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcfia-boXPGGa-8ioh-Tcg4pdEnuH2C+=e7swE2g1c2ZTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-fMhffeeeakL72JBukn_UPCRBGo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:39:39 -0000

On 6/9/16 8:11 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> I think that the hotel reservation hiccup, i.e. reserving only 200
> rooms at the venue contributed a lot to it in BsAs.

It's certainly possible.  Personally, I did not go because
it was clearly going to be very expensive to attend,
regardless.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email