IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 08 June 2016 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F64012D739 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Q3PMraHkbi3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0A2012D190 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 58622 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2016 18:12:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 8 Jun 2016 18:12:12 -0000
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:11:50 -0000
Message-ID: <20160608181150.34872.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
In-Reply-To: <256CE0D6-1A2A-459A-9800-FAF1960EDD09@consulintel.es>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VYv8LM0N1CKnSfa5VoHp5-LfEJQ>
Cc: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:12:15 -0000

>Trying to get a positive side out of this debate, I will suggest the IAOC to work with ISOC in order to
>contact the Singapore government and try to get some statement about their future intend with LGTBQ
>discriminatory laws. Probably we need to work together with locals, other organizations, etc.

Not going to happen -- the Singapore government isn't interested in our politics.

On the other hand, it's worth reading the 2014 decision where the high
court upheld the anti-sodomy law.  It's much more nuanced than you
might expect.

http://www.humandignitytrust.org/uploaded/Library/Case_Law/Singapore_CA_Judgment_29.10.14.pdf

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email