IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Fri, 10 June 2016 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=19696e7805=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C29512D0DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ruCpIldSslw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.com (mail.consulintel.com [213.0.69.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5813412D1BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:15:32 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.com (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50000589001.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:15:32 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:15:32 +0200 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Return-Path: prvs=19696e7805=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:15:32 +0200
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: andy@hxr.us
Message-ID: <E14B11FC-7E97-4814-BC46-B1B1E988AD87@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com> <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net> <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6597503E-AB88-4A89-BF86-57B06E7C8FD3@consulintel.es> <0848b990-dec1-78e9-7845-1f5b683a49cd@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4DD051C3-841E-45EE-82F0-8AF4991685A7@consulintel.es> <72313874-f19d-1a0e-0ffa-cc34e380bb8a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FADEFCB4-034F-49A1-999E-D3DF78DBFC89@consulintel.es> <CAAQiQRfeFn-az3n5OGLwQqscWJ_Up6V8M0WSrE4boRbbCLnvug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRfeFn-az3n5OGLwQqscWJ_Up6V8M0WSrE4boRbbCLnvug@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PnpSnpH77O9BpJqE2-i41AMKmV4>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:15:38 -0000

Hi Andrew,

It is not about the original comment, is about insisting on the topic once it has been warned that is becoming off-topic, and is going into a direction that becomes abusive.

I know there is a difficult balance between freedom of expression and not attacking others or their families, but we need to avoid those threads that will go nowhere.

Regards,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Responder a: <andy@hxr.us>
Fecha: viernes, 10 de junio de 2016, 18:07
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

>On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:34 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
><jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
>> Dear Secretariat,
>>
>> Speaking as sergeant-at-arms, please make sure to restrict posting rights of Mr. Masataka Ohta for the next 2 months, until 11th August, noon CET.
>
>What just happened? Did posting rights just get suspended because a
>member of the community wanted to let us know that his values differ
>from the assumed values of the broader community as stated by the IETF
>chair? In the email I read, there did not appear to be a personal
>attack.
>
>While I am not supportive of his opinion, doesn't he have the right to
>let us know that his opinion differs from that which was stated by the
>chair?
>
>-andy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email