IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

<lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Fri, 10 June 2016 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4BA12D90D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPlFA46UAFwF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm36-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm36-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6113012D0EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1465529816; bh=OAcTjAjFCfOE7LCWezJL3OxRA2rstfoCuLKB+/IATQU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=JfKCFud6ym9V/SyvSvo2+XdXlaD0+dkbeCUE1Te/u7MM6FkaidKr3IMg8eM3Jb4smMHszviYOTc+wZ75Oi+hbvnjkEl2fUhw2p04rcT+833J7/ZkaKdmnv30gKTGHs5yDQJ8noyqIwspjgdSBG4iXIfeH7OEQ+Uif9/khz1/64I4IYT8vnlS9T6Ugwb7U4l3P/xGO0JdPzb47xug262lRNF6T57UaDEZju3cqwPheuIB7omYHolBuR11HJRWTRePi21pbainOH1hxo1S3f2Z9jFte/n6F/4FKX19LHbRmlK6CitOLJlVeJmZtDyXTwhLsEAgSD13i4uDcDvBnkQrfA==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm36.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2016 03:36:56 -0000
Received: from [98.138.226.176] by nm36.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2016 03:34:05 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.62] by tm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2016 03:34:05 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.105] by tm15.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2016 03:34:04 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1042.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2016 03:34:04 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 888514.30484.bm@omp1042.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: kvD1ZG0VM1lwBMur1yIVmsbkrIPiSTCX9zKM5A5egi2bLLQPFFwQzGfMwvLVWNq sjT1T9FUn_pvqbXw1FVQ0N9kBRLLYirwfm448ZHaquRU_0u.EaW69IgTivk2FJWMbvMyVYbZC.Td WBJSf98T18Se8agaXoyt3LrgD_ndGFYdsLbkQOnyOPsMFpYSI_4BKAYFregGoscfhOuxJD7qc6bU zvgOxC_mKdvb9plSsMDKuVULy7O3ttUpT_SmOGfYWjyqeiMi6NpiIMeSL_ukyhn6B4zmSf7AIWHf 2abmjp2UKlK25iowjOt6oDpqZFM3rEUXh9dShy8ubzNS8HbDFIR2lnpKClZceSQVVwOIKctvufiW 63Y7m_trvWBjKtB41FTzyZFAMeAe4z30hQivWg4DZAiH2RmCOIpDzNjsQWX4utQw8kY20deR3Ek2 KPPwbZ93F4eKlUDsyoXfiECMb2JZUnUf7bgcGNMjkjE528aO.o4hsF08.ly7LVT9jg6UuZxOGVCg EsUQqiSkPivDhq9XPNbpHz8jz89vxJue.gu92hOQgMz1x7uY8qRj.8q0LXa.6lMlAnifdU_6ezw--
Received: from jws11106.mail.ir2.yahoo.com by sendmailws106.mail.ir2.yahoo.com; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:34:04 +0000; 1465529644.455
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:33:32 +0000
From: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1725696899.1088303.1465529612071.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EnBe3vKmbiNQJHTJb26CYQU5yqI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:36:58 -0000

I value the families of all participants equally.

Which is to say, not at all.

L.

not actually valuing participants much at this point, either.


----- Original Message -----
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, 10 June 2016, 6:59
Subject: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

On 09/06/2016 18:58, somebody wrote:

> IAOC Chair wrote:
> 
>> We, and we believe the whole IETF, value and respect our LGBTQ participants
>> and their families.
> 
> No, I don't value their families.
> 
> Moreover, it is wrong for IETF as an international technical
> body to force or expect its members value and respect LGBT.

I don't think we should let this stand in our archive without comment.

Personally, I value the families of all participants equally (including
that of the sender of the quoted message). I also expect all IETF
participants to value and respect each other regardless of everything
personal about them.

  Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email