Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com> Thu, 16 June 2016 12:58 UTC
Return-Path: <margaretw42@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7A412D576 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_HELO_HOME=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKbvvnjKd0_k for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F49D12D625 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c72so41633201ywb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=D7spDPBOwQat3UOJ6nwO3YAo65GbgbPxrfuA3qrJHLk=; b=MlIPVScf6aYJJdDl7Lb1nwP71nyyz83nvmTZJD38lPunHtkZUTDLi0TWji7j3avNjF sHjm+6K/wGyYqYUdH5G7ZkJN8dPLgIS6GZHgJsKZ5BxgmTKCgmLxRfkwVdEnDsp0dV67 aerMKOwgyPQxvcfwJO5DpuXIgeiqEeiAvVhC69Z8Ocfqiy0sBYuahU/y7CUZhm4w8H13 tyx41H46QbO1VMXGS2Jb6Mmn4vLyoyFkQJSnCMtDk0h9zcTWRqanIR2wRQLmB/NT7j/V M5ZJLa/ql1w6gc1h638/q5A5vTJoSrQ29BVDb8j6f86QpJ1bcLVUu9LZIbJtg8M/QfOR JBdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=D7spDPBOwQat3UOJ6nwO3YAo65GbgbPxrfuA3qrJHLk=; b=EDqMGxtBkeQKJDOw3ri4dIf/1oW3SM5J3GT2z7I6LxI0AAa5+TOxXE2Z+17dOiiOaI ztanQp2OXDyEPO0fWiqQTMEIapv9BH+ufYxGF3rVY9cckNlMNa0PvUMD3vDX80dbJnVx CGOBodLg5c4mSQDNdCJuuOPpEaqRzbkwzXlzTPomFd/NERNAQRPKEIAteoyH/m73IZxZ b/NYqBaRScTs5SXPPhamQQBNHd75CklhDpBFmGQHaQTe4NVEAz6BAroHQaAgdq3GjE+a u35TWZuj8MwrSIKOSjLtkv0qnarLgbCFLumDHrG80qc2x4tr7FsrG/GF6eEZdK9VQQPM trYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKxefAOizTto3NFPpNrTjeyekzmLSUpB0uO5+tSgK7CPv3L2eF4FeHpIbStQUUmWQ==
X-Received: by 10.13.203.68 with SMTP id n65mr628726ywd.262.1466081914259; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from margarets-air-3.home (pool-72-74-19-153.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [72.74.19.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k186sm5368881ywe.54.2016.06.16.05.58.33 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
From: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:58:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1275125C-DC40-4F6F-B8D8-302B5CC86E15@gmail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5gumul3TXLUYJJ_9ZqVkNb_wx1Y>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:58:37 -0000
Ohta-san, > On Jun 9, 2016, at 2:58 AM, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: > > No, I don't value their families. > > Moreover, it is wrong for IETF as an international technical > body to force or expect its members value and respect LGBT. I have treated you with respect for many years, even when we have strongly disagreed about technical issues, but I find this statement personally offensive, and unacceptable. The IETF has an anti-harassment policy that specifically forbids harassment based on race, gender, religion, age, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity. You can believe and say whatever you like in your private life, but in the IETF you need to behave in ways that are respectful of people of any race, gender, religion, age, color, nation origin, ancestry, disability, _sexual orientation, or gender identity_. That is the stated policy and consensus of the IETF, regardless of whether it matches your personal views. Margaret
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Margaret Cullen
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Masataka Ohta
- IETF 100, IAOC perspective IAOC Chair
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective Robin Wilton
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective Jakob Heitz
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective John Levine
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Tim Chown
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Yoav Nir
- Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Eliot Lear
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… lloyd.wood
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Meeting discussions (was: IETF 100, IAOC perspect… S Moonesamy
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Lloyd Wood
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Andrew Newton
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Michael StJohns
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Donald Eastlake
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Melinda Shore
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Andrew Allen
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… John Leslie
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Lloyd Wood
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… John C Klensin
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… John C Klensin
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta