Meeting discussions (was: IETF 100, IAOC perspective)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0154912D9E4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=dlxlSq14; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=Yn46VPdM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ek0zsnD-30tp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7AC12D0B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.211.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5A8SrQP029670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1465547346; x=1465633746; bh=7bayWw1SWfDwv51GT7WmC1oeSLpU9keEjGK0T0DzC9U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dlxlSq14aflYILYnVxbPQaNQ1Vp7J2UXx1RnyTx8E0me76w82X8fXgYoXew5jJ4Nh Pr8HqfEKx1ek8lwMPUuZrQ/+R1inKnLssZHd7ZMekG4D0B1JHmLceK78DBPC1LOD9Y bpxO/to5ijqNWDPTyE+QNm/W0+rOs8D6HTrsIVCg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1465547346; x=1465633746; i=@elandsys.com; bh=7bayWw1SWfDwv51GT7WmC1oeSLpU9keEjGK0T0DzC9U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Yn46VPdM0e15pU2pM/1SXDU3WpRqNe9Ap59BlF24bSICMHoqHVgWxa16dZyUEx2GQ 3yz2JtaT736XOgNy02+a6AYeGL1y0g4dn9RwonL2Ebl1nbfJC4Cx0Pj6I3mUjijBl3 Awz60kAtGrpGwliiXxW6Pp9HEzhwf99I/MwhAi6k=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160610001723.0d556a30@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:28:35 -0700
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Meeting discussions (was: IETF 100, IAOC perspective)
In-Reply-To: <d26d6464-f66c-85b5-6949-89eebc641581@cisco.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <256CE0D6-1A2A-459A-9800-FAF1960EDD09@consulintel.es> <D6E8D8D5-EB54-412C-9620-A8A3B2EC674B@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcewGyG3hTy4vPzuu69mznXOC-gMrODQefUqscqfwKwKTg@mail.gmail.com> <82901186-58D0-4C71-9562-57F90DFCE0CF@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcfia-boXPGGa-8ioh-Tcg4pdEnuH2C+=e7swE2g1c2ZTg@mail.gmail.com> <cd3058b4-28f7-59d2-1596-cdf8c6ea359e@gmail.com> <9ebfd327-9faf-dc0b-914f-138a2be4908f@cisco.com> <ca583cf2-ed15-7563-7f4d-4aa813227b2e@comcast.net> <d26d6464-f66c-85b5-6949-89eebc641581@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-EUQsAanWxDAGdWm85xOT3e056s>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, ietf@ietf.org, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:29:14 -0000

Hi Eliot,

I am contacting you as part of the facilitators experiment:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97290.html

At 14:16 09-06-2016, Eliot Lear wrote:
>While revenue is important, I want to point out that I was talking about
>an experiment, doing it once, and then figuring things out from there.
>I think Yoav's point is important too.  Maybe we're talking ONLY about
>virtual interims.  That does away with host issues and travel.

I consider the above comment as useful.  There are times when it is a 
good thing to send a comment, like the above, to ietf@ietf.org as it 
helps to clarify some misunderstanding in a discussion.

There is a message from Christian at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg98501.html  I 
suggest discussing about IETF meetings on the mailing list at 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue

Regards,
S. Moonesamy