IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 12 June 2016 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC312B037 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 02:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imvzkSGmrpgM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 02:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73F01200A0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 02:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88532CC9C; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:06:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9afFpycAACU; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:06:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402A52CC64; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:06:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7E2E4ED4-E618-42FC-A9D4-0A8ADB21EE5E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160611235942.GA39331@verdi>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:06:59 +0300
Message-Id: <4EB73B04-59F7-4742-9508-C8294C502756@piuha.net>
References: <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net> <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6597503E-AB88-4A89-BF86-57B06E7C8FD3@consulintel.es> <0848b990-dec1-78e9-7845-1f5b683a49cd@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4DD051C3-841E-45EE-82F0-8AF4991685A7@consulintel.es> <72313874-f19d-1a0e-0ffa-cc34e380bb8a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FADEFCB4-034F-49A1-999E-D3DF78DBFC89@consulintel.es> <6ac2732b-3c16-f3ff-059c-4eb9e75df71f@comcast.net> <11AB7E04-7B52-492B-A94F-BD46A986EB23@piuha.net> <20160611235942.GA39331@verdi>
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/O1DsjhEuTV9ibSJzhPzNYuEU6xs>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:07:05 -0000

Sorry I was unclear.

BCP 54 and mails to the list and forms of disrespect can of course be read in different ways. Part of why we are reviewing the situation again next week.

My explanation of the two categories of discussion (the OK and the not OK) was intended as an explanation of policy, not as criticism.

> 1: Don't annoy others unnecessarily; and
> 2: Don't be too easily annoyed.

Good advice.

I do want to add that it isn’t really sergeant-of-arm’s or IETF chair’s role to be disturbed or annoyed by emails on the list. Our job is to watch for possibly inappropriate postings on the list, mainly for the sake of other participants or the progress of the discussion. Opinions on what constitutes a problem may of course differ.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email