Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D374B12DADC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tNSJKyVCNDe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA9C12DAA8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1bBDQN-0003bJ-W4; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:48:00 +0000
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 20:47:59 -0700
Message-ID: <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
In-Reply-To: <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/l08InUrGQt-HIDNfFfHC3NjGUoE>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:48:03 -0000

> someone i must have in my .procmailrc
>> Moreover, it is wrong for IETF as an international technical
>> body to force or expect its members value and respect LGBT.

Brian: 
> I don't think we should let this stand in our archive without comment.

strongly agree.  i am appalled.  i thougt we even documented this as
policy.

> Personally, I value the families of all participants equally
> (including that of the sender of the quoted message). I also expect
> all IETF participants to value and respect each other regardless of
> everything personal about them.

yes, and even occasionally because of everything personal about them.

randy