IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 10 June 2016 08:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84FB12D9CD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3K2o7EGtnBOJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EA3212D0B2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 70489 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2016 08:12:10 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 10 Jun 2016 08:12:10 -0000
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com> <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:33:18 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/P6vX99cvOlrP6q7iM24bNwnVZoY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:33:29 -0000

lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 > I value the families of all participants equally.
 >
 > Which is to say, not at all.

Yup.

 > not actually valuing participants much at this point, either.

I value participants on his/her technical contribution to
collective wisdom or, more frequently, stupidity.


Jari Arkko wrote:

> Our mode of operation is to recognise diversity among us, emphasize
> the value of mutual respect and behave professionally, see RFC 7154
> for instance. Disrespectful comments are out of line and
> inappropriate. Please behave.

The most important thing for the operation is to recognize cultural
diversity, which means we must value and respect culture to ban or
damn LGBT.

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email