Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 10 June 2016 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811C412D9DA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itnzzsjYMmVA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 332B612D0CC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 79431 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2016 12:26:06 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 10 Jun 2016 12:26:06 -0000
Subject: Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <256CE0D6-1A2A-459A-9800-FAF1960EDD09@consulintel.es> <CADVih5Q1UtJ8z-U238Qev0-ci2hDc62jK5brGqeKQqLd018vaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADVih5S3v+pDbyKuukdgH+9zXzMAFooP5N4ebzJFYa3fH2Bx3A@mail.gmail.com> <CADVih5QEW2KSOn8csR=UmpTaHhYwjiQ-Nc-yQmCd4bFYfBt=Zw@mail.gmail.com> <6548E939-4A7F-4CCB-90DE-11A0811C4BD3@consulintel.es> <57598B4F.4040106@alvestrand.no> <523113525.1483090.1465560537542.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <4540ad00-5233-b498-f95d-356a53c7709b@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:47:13 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <523113525.1483090.1465560537542.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Sk2wLkYwJeyv9PcFJrpJDAoB0V4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:47:31 -0000

Lloyd Wood wrote:

 > ALL participants' families are equally unimportant;

Of course. We are a technical body, for which, only
technical contributions are important.

 > On Friday, June 10, 2016, 1:30 AM, Harald Alvestrand
 > <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> For some reason I'm reminded of the (apparent) belief of old NetNews
> denizens that one could shape the Real World by rearranging the
> hierarchy of NetNews group names (remember
> soc.religion.islam.ahmadi?)

It means that NetNews can not affect cultural hierarchy (or, more
precisely, relationships) in the real world. Nor can IETF.

						Masataka Ohta