IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]

Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> Sat, 11 June 2016 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <aallen@blackberry.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20C212DB31 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4x2gEea_Z11 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-p01.blackberry.com (smtp-p01.blackberry.com [208.65.78.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBB312D636 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-pop.rim.net (HELO XCT104CNC.rim.net) ([10.65.161.204]) by mhs212cnc.rim.net with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 11 Jun 2016 13:38:13 -0400
Received: from XMB122CNC.rim.net ([fe80::28c6:fa1c:91c6:2e23]) by XCT104CNC.rim.net ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:20:55 -0400
From: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
Thread-Topic: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
Thread-Index: AQHRwpHbxz7nncV7ZEyBBOxGGHRivZ/iU62AgAARBwCAAD6wAIAAAh6AgAASkoCAAAQbAIAAGDsAgAABpgCAAExIgIAAFXyAgAAtgYCAAAPmAIAAm6wAgABfpu8=
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:20:54 +0000
Message-ID: <20160611152051.6492248.39011.20340@blackberry.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com> <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net> <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6597503E-AB88-4A89-BF86-57B06E7C8FD3@consulintel.es> <0848b990-dec1-78e9-7845-1f5b683a49cd@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4DD051C3-841E-45EE-82F0-8AF4991685A7@consulintel.es> <72313874-f19d-1a0e-0ffa-cc34e380bb8a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FADEFCB4-034F-49A1-999E-D3DF78DBFC89@consulintel.es> <CAAQiQRfeFn-az3n5OGLwQqscWJ_Up6V8M0WSrE4boRbbCLnvug@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFCtf4HmEZfUvzb7wH_8Ov2g0CdRzzzYsrAhhp2NhR3rg@mail.gmail.com> <128d6b02-bbf9-3afb-7353-4f411a2eb8c2@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <ad649e68-f134-bf71-8c0f-f71869a88bc8@gmail.com>, <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606110730360.28955@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606110730360.28955@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u6R__rpnNbPM7Elvy-Ux1Byl6_0>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:20:58 -0000

And that is a very important distinction because if they did in fact criminalize someone's status and not just their behavior then we could not meet there.


Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message
From: Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 13:38
To: Melinda Shore
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]


On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Melinda Shore wrote:

> For the purpose of clarity, and in hopes that we can stick to the facts
> (to the extent they're known), the issue with Singapore is not that they
> do not recognize same-sex marriage but that they have laws criminalizing
> same-sex relationships.

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Singapore they
criminalize "male same-sex sexual activity".

I don't know if that's what you mean by "relationships", but in the strict
sense of the word, Singapore doesn't criminalize the actual relationship.
It doesn't even criminalize "same-sex sexual activity". It criminalizes
"MALE same-sex sexual activity".

Since you said "for the purpose of clarity" and "stick to the facts", I
thought this needed to be clarified.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email