IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 08 June 2016 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD0A12D69E; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_QV3ykgX-Qd; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C31D12D668; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m124so30806253wme.1; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wapUGrV/1lCcnpPFX8SJ0Mroyq4Gs0vKf+lpoJcmZ1w=; b=H2JlHcN59mP8ywvYtyEpInTlTlHNIdQy/FJnns4ckyUg9YLJYjCcLXicmOBTtrGvVs m74LSaPBl6MAocv0EEFImVdeFvfEO2zprTbdvtie9jr93+bDMovUT68VqmoLTUea1rhI Sr6WYN8RWvZ6ne42oENwqqTyzyIsBZYZ81dl9TuDp3INIkonhw/bsAb9o9aMMaWMLEjJ DEqXLK2/n56vaXUj7KiP7hct/6E9elLAdemfj8FAO+6aLiKFcPkWaVOTBSQ6mwVbBCTM SC70h854lbCUq+/zmFsVGuzU9/Y34LhJHcaKUJxNqMMZtWATGW9njYOLY3DP3budAmSV chvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wapUGrV/1lCcnpPFX8SJ0Mroyq4Gs0vKf+lpoJcmZ1w=; b=RVceaERzkpR0w+yppvzRWsy4yWmDkQbv3NRpk+aXIJldiYKPHZfT9s3/s/a9F41Unp HHUyXFIL/GoHDRT0G+XxWo2PID1i5tGfJejJ4QvVVFYXZO6Xad36Yz6C74Fv5HT91ANN 6xnSKhzGK/bXqT732jkCin7P4Wz23sUv6hFEqz5MFWtLOzzmh9nQdJ0o34Qio8cGnW24 SuCGM+ifYS0TdsIUB6hSgWhJTxkGiblJiz2/vUmQiuUs1c+LA6c3IsSSCPRohgHA+lMP 9GcdYpEQZNKRqGI4MvAwLIG9gu4A5UPYhwwU4PujSPPAWwDoGqVmREFSSbcM4udh9Rx5 J/8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL7pB92qkTyY9x+edZnN/Y14cYVfdAV1VmoF5oVhmiNLatrvnzoKzRPjPEQd3cLTQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.47.5 with SMTP id z5mr6755449wjm.41.1465414179683; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id zg2sm3121302wjb.1.2016.06.08.12.29.38 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcewGyG3hTy4vPzuu69mznXOC-gMrODQefUqscqfwKwKTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:29:37 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <82901186-58D0-4C71-9562-57F90DFCE0CF@gmail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <256CE0D6-1A2A-459A-9800-FAF1960EDD09@consulintel.es> <D6E8D8D5-EB54-412C-9620-A8A3B2EC674B@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcewGyG3hTy4vPzuu69mznXOC-gMrODQefUqscqfwKwKTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PNE00RDAB4IFAGeF91YNMcakDos>
Cc: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, recentattendees@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 19:29:43 -0000

> On 8 Jun 2016, at 7:00 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I doubt they will be able or willing to help much. “Your country is evil and discriminatory. What do you have to say about this?”  Besides, we’d be talking to the executive branch, while change tends to come from either the legislative or judicial. I also don’t believe it’s the job of the IETF to give “red face” to officials of host countries. Making a habit of this will make us about as welcome as the globalization protesters were 15 years ago.
>> 
>> Deciding not to meet somewhere is one thing. Extending the agenda of meetings from just technical work to technical work plus political protest is not a good idea.
>> 
> 
> +1 to both of the above points
> 
>> The good outcome coming out of this is the decision to crowd-source the vetting of possible destinations such as [1]. A message such as this about Singapore would have prevented quite a bit of “red face” for the IAOC.
>> 
> 
> I am not sure about this. I thought IOAC said it is difficult/costly
> to change Singapore venue at this moment.
> 

Sorry. I meant, “A message such as this about Singapore **a year ago** would have prevented quite a bit..”

Somehow I forgot to type those three words.

Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email