Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B7E12D0D9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hr4HTPzhgzM9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CEE412B060 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l44so37255310qgd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=xxId/Y6ba0wPOS3Ma+RBFJJCA7TJZ2udI+jTC3S0Syc=; b=SiFGRQ3A5Ex1bTMjhn5+Ge2qdF1ustWON2MuaKTgP1z7gxBA0OK0DNS1H6DR875fvE UW1uuQ+Gqg/XNtpPDebQhG+SFzQao4KqsCxMgdKNG9UeMLZH1hHOgPALc+QY0SqkO7pd qqB2A988ccTDi49UxElx4YMbWbiiBK5RG5J9Aqk0aq1IUrMYALygvRSO2/BsZpoMNZwp aQDz+FUwQ5aOrSDJOG7tXyURfWiraevHOM449FJR8KnHcdctWIGauedelncP/Krkgst6 UbAGrJmKvMCZ1zHIRmxug9yd8PtoVLaljzIrb2ki8tfPAi32nxDnrQ/Djs/EME6UdlOu qlVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xxId/Y6ba0wPOS3Ma+RBFJJCA7TJZ2udI+jTC3S0Syc=; b=GQVILuOcidkx1c4OkPG/U4Y5RKIUzGWXjLSvQluzRnCZ56jg+lEUbLrvOoiyS0ZkIs nzNkZtkjFkEOW+OgVOGd/eidlRRb+CVloEhbsPfAKnzyKw+6v879XHoEIRjzmy5+1KA2 yJytesEoB5xFxGwfeFl7hTTw/FhF8ZMC3TCzmF4loKoElZGfcOwSJcg0J5rUI/wGm2Ax NS2pxAQPuyqYBnBFyf3pcMqLG1M4t+EXMd90QSA1/UQIcIyjn2aKkgdPRNQTR0hrcoyO 3evXqXnkfyYIF0s0yQhZme5nwkw/TuxbUkmd7dTsoKQOGVCHCNpLb+hsDqZWbvl2t3sP SCQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ81VWl1TpeCKc5VCV362/9lY1Om72BIp1Dupe7XUcyu8y7b1223m4tkjlsW/in1p36rs5v9zrpu3uIbA==
X-Received: by 10.140.41.200 with SMTP id z66mr2478022qgz.20.1465573985504; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.55.25.85 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:53:04 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: A9ubEWA00uuh92oC75KxnlSCyTk
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwifWXzUoxP-k3B0SbYze5qac70x1RpUCWRpamzBLnCRFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c13b84cc8a770534ee885b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aVf99lH0xo6Mk9cibF5yW3ycQGY>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:53:07 -0000
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2016 18:58, somebody wrote: > > IAOC Chair wrote: > > > >> We, and we believe the whole IETF, value and respect our LGBTQ > participants > >> and their families. > > > > No, I don't value their families. > > > > Moreover, it is wrong for IETF as an international technical > > body to force or expect its members value and respect LGBT. > > I don't think we should let this stand in our archive without comment. > > Personally, I value the families of all participants equally (including > that of the sender of the quoted message). I also expect all IETF > participants to value and respect each other regardless of everything > personal about them > +1 I was going to respond. And then I thought probably best leave it to someone else. What does worry me somewhat is that we are an international organization and we don't seem to have discussed the issue with the local LGBT community. During the debate on same sex marriage in the US we had a lot of pointed attacks on the UK position being a 'sell out' which were rather unfortunate if you don't understand that until quite recently England and Wales the only 'marriages' that were recognized by the state were those that took place in CoE churches. If you were a member of my church, a civil union was the only option open for over two hundred years.
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Margaret Cullen
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Masataka Ohta
- IETF 100, IAOC perspective IAOC Chair
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective Robin Wilton
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective Jakob Heitz
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective John Levine
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Tim Chown
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Yoav Nir
- Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Eliot Lear
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… lloyd.wood
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Meeting discussions (was: IETF 100, IAOC perspect… S Moonesamy
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Lloyd Wood
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Andrew Newton
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Michael StJohns
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Donald Eastlake
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Melinda Shore
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Andrew Allen
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… John Leslie
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Lloyd Wood
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… John C Klensin
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… John C Klensin
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspec… Masataka Ohta