Re: leader statements
Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 10 October 2013 18:30 UTC
Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D3421F99F0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgFS0+gBtT1a for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D0D21E8098 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp2so2978524pbb.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xIG+gFsD8hx9bphOYERWuyEL50dWyqVRwXC/sior3yk=; b=zhtQeJ1x4u9Ui0gwqovfI6rLF1RTfmfgagE1EaBJC5M+W1LZ8pDloPjWme6HgL5MQE BJtpgMOqnCRvFRg+VYmy4jpkvDIwrc9rQZsGbBK9ClVYiEyjYQJMoBXH1ra0IU4UNZ79 5VZW37kURQ5vXSJ/yVmpqDQK18dKtlPub3I43Ie8sBcYz9wWegpgc938097EGw4y2RbU WZiUDo9wvVZxrRP2ymatyLmQWO8mayIstfb5xX6C7hg90tswE75JkljAxb9XwUqv902J fDNamdTSt9IssoYq6v1rPv9Yr0q168xb+V5P13th6J97pXybT8bcy8EFXzlOTJiY3rfi jJJA==
X-Received: by 10.66.170.168 with SMTP id an8mr17394741pac.58.1381429820986; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-113-166.dynamic.dsl.acsalaska.net. [216.67.113.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm54654023pbu.38.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5256F239.1000400@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:30:17 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: leader statements
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131008213432.0c1e4b30@resistor.net> <20131009064438.GA47673@mx1.yitter.info> <E003D3DC4E4B3208CF14E8E0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20131009192715.GG49231@mx1.yitter.info> <5255B647.4090103@gmail.com> <93D54BF0-FFE6-4A3D-ADDE-7EC2FC3AFBC0@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <93D54BF0-FFE6-4A3D-ADDE-7EC2FC3AFBC0@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:30:33 -0000
On 10/10/13 9:49 AM, manning bill wrote: > the "leaders" are there to inform and moderate the discussion and > where possible, indicate that consensus has been reached (or not). > when "leaders" speak out on behalf of organization -particularly- > this organization and they are _NOT_ relaying the consensus of the > group at large, they have exceeded their remit. I really think we need to stop behaving as if the IETF is a small group of people who know each other well. Consensus decision-making does not scale well with the number of participants, and if we're going to require consensus on every leadership decision we're not going to get anything done. Now, being frozen and inactive may be preferable to having Jari and Russ go off and make a cooperative public statement about internet governance, but it seems to me that as long as we have recall and appeals processes we have incentives for IETF and IAB chairs, and IESG and IAB members, not to go off and do controversial things unilaterally, as well as a remedy if they do. Melinda
- Re: Montevideo statement Noel Chiappa
- Montevideo statement IETF Chair
- Re: Montevideo statement Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement Martin Millnert
- Re: Montevideo statement Tobias Gondrom
- Re: Montevideo statement manning bill
- Re: Montevideo statement Michael Richardson
- Re: Montevideo statement Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement manning bill
- Re: Montevideo statement SM
- Re: Montevideo statement Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Montevideo statement joel jaeggli
- Re: Montevideo statement Ted Lemon
- Re: Montevideo statement John C Klensin
- Re: Montevideo statement Tobias Gondrom
- Re: Montevideo statement Russ Housley
- Re: Montevideo statement joel jaeggli
- leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Montevideo statement Arturo Servin
- Re: Montevideo statement SM
- Re: Montevideo statement Russ Housley
- Re: leader statements Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Montevideo statement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: leader statements Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: leader statements Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: leader statements Brian E Carpenter
- "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Go… Carsten Bormann
- Re: leader statements Scott Brim
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) SM
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement Medel v6 Ramirez
- Re: Montevideo statement Dave Crocker
- Re: leader statements manning bill
- Re: leader statements Arturo Servin
- Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement) manning bill
- Re: leader statements Melinda Shore
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement Ted Lemon
- Re: leader statements Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: Montevideo statement Dave Crocker
- Re: Montevideo statement Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Montevideo statement SM
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Jorge Amodio
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… John Levine
- Re: leader statements Suzanne Woolf
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Jorge Amodio
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Dave Crocker
- Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the U… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Montevideo statement Michael Richardson
- Re: Montevideo statement Jari Arkko
- Re: Montevideo statement John C Klensin
- Re: Montevideo statement Randy Bush
- Re: [IETF] Re: Montevideo statement Warren Kumari
- Re: Montevideo statement Jorge Amodio
- Re: [IETF] Re: Montevideo statement shogunx