IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Montevideo statement

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 10 October 2013 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B40721F99F0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J529Wlv4VnQ1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4F421E80B9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CB02CC6C; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:31:19 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5O0jXHw-7AC; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:31:18 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458412CC48; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:31:18 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Montevideo statement
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <5256DE72.4010705@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:31:17 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BD554473-CD9D-4795-A125-A4E52EAEC68D@piuha.net>
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <5256DE72.4010705@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:32:26 -0000

Dave:

On IANA:

> Further, I believe there is no IETF context

RFC 6020 and http://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2011/07/IANA-IAB-FNOI-2011.pdf

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email