IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Extending a /64

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Thu, 19 November 2020 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525133A0EFC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:23:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nrjFJQQ6Ntpr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9A343A044A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id k3so6216271otp.12 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:23:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7zMs19iqyOfbATwa5aM/q3ncAotK1AsGVdk5E/w9vZQ=; b=SslFP8MVFLWZGWc54W6GiprtdhPHryWJ3bgU+cNQf/duvJJoqtWocztCqwqrODgcYC W9Ga9glqEDz1msOCunHH45vsMt1z0Cdz2Du9j4jx5UhplmIb/7eA1yI3XUCipvSb+YGT 4ZQRqxUK6orMA3onzADVpFtKiO6PaZeclqsYgcDBbYO1vfiPlnyzFthHzU9k5XCaQKPh 7otl5o6cvkW+Qy6tf5PdJVHnyX78zgrt28zhmPq5LgVyrF41tWqX75NnnL0UkNJ1HT+8 cIZT7f704eoDUVb+g84HaBDwR6rqoRJnugC5mMIaxkK2gTBQDuqeDFFmo5t8WrerqsNG Ay1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7zMs19iqyOfbATwa5aM/q3ncAotK1AsGVdk5E/w9vZQ=; b=YNOuxG8oy88z7KTyajdjMRn/6dEL4eYzdNVht7IGI5lZMI5t+PnzzPbmZFx/FXqhIR 0nfAHNkGaNOvjs2Ey6gHQZq1Fcsljuaf7BCIBpnq0SpHQWM2nNEO7uFvOtC1hqCuFR+0 dlJCbuHXcmiPgmB5LirwQ5xxNlhtbtxIVt5zESiVVQThaBMzF1UWwKbUCJ8LkyxWiZFL Zojij02mE+7VWggadLnJM+jdbQDHgeEzJ0wpKZylv+8nSQEgtWEGvNXVsOs+NPLDkkbc 4Km5gueAk7hOwSd5UytrNj9FNlLz47wfSxIV6yMg6BdHqYEfARDz4imXxiCgH8lMc8j4 9ofg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530z0GkmhLV+LyXtT2M6I62tMl8I8nKeCheQaewL8FyQka/Ff3+g /pL5hCU4LKqJNQtR0KX1klvYWW9f76la4YrKh/kxXB5D
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybpNrilQHVQkF6LK8UIqyA5tEUorwKsQ8JGAsTi4DgX3iGIOCGWnRff+vo/ovXBqJlD6jczxkuWV/nH81bJt0=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:a0d:: with SMTP id 13mr10309102otg.348.1605810202037; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:23:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202011151920.0AFJKN9U003337@mail2.mwassocs.co.uk> <3d26bffe-b6c9-4ed7-6135-a515f9902fd7@gmail.com> <m1keOTi-0000EGC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAO42Z2wZkXryhw1u5WAFdtCvXHyyz1zeM22FP_gRxjurjsG-Jw@mail.gmail.com> <5f505585-1328-d942-2ec2-a2d96b7b4779@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2yk5pEKGFEYk3MDDDybVDZt6GiE1Pw932n4gLaqSxGH7A@mail.gmail.com> <23487.1605731956@localhost> <CAO42Z2yesLcdRw0HrNBsUAm-x=T9OneCjPMLmq8oZ4_ZH99Tsw@mail.gmail.com> <8f6bab4b-4171-66ba-cff4-742adc10ceea@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <8f6bab4b-4171-66ba-cff4-742adc10ceea@foobar.org>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:23:10 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2yz5EBxwLzuTs8GiS-N48EcygxQdL7jn19P23dBQ_=RYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Extending a /64
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab4fdc05b479d2cf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/7F4JpKJKo5J3zGi5IN3NST9CY_8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:23:24 -0000

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, 22:30 Nick Hilliard, <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> the key phrase is:
>
> Mark Smith wrote on 19/11/2020 05:22:
> > [...] without any intention to ever
> >     directly connect to other enterprises or the Internet itself.
>
> If the ICAO can guarantee that ipv6 assignments to aircraft will never
> be used to directly connect to other third party networks, then ULA will
> work fine. I doubt that this is a safe assumption.
>

I'm sure insurance companies and aviation authorities will have the
controlling say in this.



> Nick
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email