Re: Extending a /64

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 19 November 2020 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492AD3A12EF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:27:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBIANlcNyv1M for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [46.182.8.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 468AD3A12ED for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:27:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: ipv6@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 0AJMR9LJ022504 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:27:10 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be crumpet.local
Subject: Re: Extending a /64
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Whyman <tony.whyman@mccallumwhyman.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <202011151920.0AFJKN9U003337@mail2.mwassocs.co.uk> <3d26bffe-b6c9-4ed7-6135-a515f9902fd7@gmail.com> <m1keOTi-0000EGC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAO42Z2wZkXryhw1u5WAFdtCvXHyyz1zeM22FP_gRxjurjsG-Jw@mail.gmail.com> <5f505585-1328-d942-2ec2-a2d96b7b4779@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2yk5pEKGFEYk3MDDDybVDZt6GiE1Pw932n4gLaqSxGH7A@mail.gmail.com> <23487.1605731956@localhost> <CAO42Z2yesLcdRw0HrNBsUAm-x=T9OneCjPMLmq8oZ4_ZH99Tsw@mail.gmail.com> <8f6bab4b-4171-66ba-cff4-742adc10ceea@foobar.org> <01cd5a82-be72-54b8-0171-3720f25cae0d@mccallumwhyman.com> <CAO42Z2xYAut_dfQtGrwkm7VWw9NPhsa5xaE9NqjCaK9L8RoMQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <7c500d2b-bc44-d00e-9cc2-96046c6ec5d6@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:27:08 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.36
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xYAut_dfQtGrwkm7VWw9NPhsa5xaE9NqjCaK9L8RoMQA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Gb2OFIWlS3OU2lU-dzAegj5uQ4w>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:27:20 -0000

Mark Smith wrote on 19/11/2020 19:56:
> What makes you think that once you have a high order prefix, you have 
> the freedom to arbitrarily define the format and semantics of any of the 
> low order bits?

the cart needs to go before the horse.

If Tony is saying that ipv6 assignments to aircraft could - even 
possibly - be used to directly connect to other third party networks, 
then ULA is inappropriate and we can park that discussion.  This leaves 
GUA or something else from other IANA-reserved address space.

Thing is, if an organisation feels that their needs for ip address 
allocation are sufficiently different from everyone else's in the world 
that they need to bypass the RIRs and apply for a direct IANA 
reservation - whether that be in GUA space or not - then the 
organisation needs to make a case which justifies this ask.

Obviously there's no problem discussing ideas on 6man to get the lay of 
the land, but bypassing the RIRs for addressing requirements seems to be 
an extraordinary ask, and an extraordinary request will need 
extraordinary justification.

Nick