Re: Extending a /64

For this to be idea to come to fruition we need buy in from both 3GPP
architecture to allow  < 64 ra and IETF as well RFC 4291 and 4862.

Cameron

Would 3GPP architecture just have to update their code  to support shorter
prefix RA, or is there anything else technical that has to change on the
3GPP end.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 8:15 PM George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:

> There is a liaison function between the RIR and the IETF, and the IETF
> and IANA regarding address dispositions. When people reach a point
> they believe there is a need for an unusual assignment from global
> unicast space, the proper thing to do, is invoke the liaison function,
> and have this dealt with respectfully across distinct process
> boundaries regarding how addresses are managed and delegated.
>
> As long as the people who perform this liaison function are aware of
> this conversation, nothing much else has to be said here. I would ask
> that the WG chairs and AD keep that in mind.
>
> cheers
>
> -George
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:45 AM Michael Richardson
> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Tony Whyman <tony.whyman@mccallumwhyman.com> wrote:
> >     > In the end, we concluded that we could not bend the existing
> standards
> >     > to do this and did not have the desire to push for change. Hence,
> we
> >     > are in the process of asking IANA for a /16 for the global civil
> >     > aviation community. Hopefully we will get this. However, an
> argument is
> >     > expected given that the current policies push back against such a
> large
> >     > allocation and demand a utilisation efficiency that we will never
> >     > achieve. However, if we don't get a /16 and the standards stay as
> they
> >     > are, then a private address space and NAT at the boundaries may be
> the
> >     > only answer - not really what anyone wants.
> >
> > I think that it's pretty important that the IETF IPv6 community
> understand
> > your needs, and speak clearly in support of your needs.
> >
> > What would happen if you had a /18 or a /20?
> >
> > --
> > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT
> consulting )
> >            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD