Re: Extending a /64

Le 16/11/2020 à 15:38, Tony Whyman a écrit :
> This discussion seems to have gone off in the wrong direction. There are 
> no ICAO applications that foresee aircraft to aircraft communication 
> using datalink.

Eh?  Maybe with LDACS? draft-ietf-raw-ldacs-05 "5.2.2.  Air-to-Air 
Extension for LDACS"

Alex

  The underlying set of applications is:
> 
> 1. Controller to Pilot Datalink Communication (CPDLC) - the name says it 
> all
> 
> 2. Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS) - allows an ATS Provider to 
> monitor an aircraft's position and intent.
> 
> 3. Flight Information Services (FIS) - allows a pilot to pull 
> information (e.g. on runway conditions).
> 
> TCAS also exists as a collision avoidance system and this does use 
> air-to-air communication. However, this is a rider on the Mode S 
> surveillance radar and is not IP based.
> 
> On 16/11/2020 14:30, Philip Homburg wrote:
>> However, this seems to be a case of doing things at the wrong level. 
>> If aircaft
>> use IPv6 to communicate then obvious they need unique IPv6 addresses. 
>> However,
>> each plane only needs to know its own address. Any time a plane 
>> communicates
>> with an unknown plane, they can exchange higher level identities.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------