IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Extending a /64

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 10 November 2020 03:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6849D3A15C3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:01:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kAYeKC0U64r for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9859C3A15C2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4598A389E5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:02:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CuwmfUaimCwk for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:02:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC47389C2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:02:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A753F558 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:01:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Extending a /64
In-Reply-To: <24577.1604973670@localhost>
References: <m1kbkaI-0000ImC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <24577.1604973670@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 22:01:38 -0500
Message-ID: <8413.1604977298@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZORCYuLv3bdM601C4iRe-MDkQVM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:01:42 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > While Barbara makes good point in another thread about how we whack on
    > operators a lot: there are an awful lot of really good clueful ones.
    > They just don't come to the IETF (or NANOG or RIPE or Apricot), I think.

I missed a not.

While Barbara makes good point in another thread about how we whack on
operators a lot: there are an awful lot of really good clueful ones.

It is the bad ones that we need to talk to more, and unfornately, they just
don't come to the IETF (or NANOG or RIPE or Apricot), I think.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email