Re: Extending a /64

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sun, 15 November 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FBE3A091C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iNw_boh4vcEq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F473A091B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id q206so16608216oif.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:55:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=THT0dRB8J3NG1zUuw0aw73MaEfrohr1qae3tBRt114A=; b=AOaiG+yPkDzTpWZa90luevkfbRtq4a2rWIHu+vzxImo9flXdIzbjA6OgLeo73yUteI 76kABOaCsfhkB4UVcGoFLj5ET+diFTzh2DZTUEp5zE84TgVfud9wwh5EysBpDluuxPP4 QDKz6oKMds170YrbjM7p1pPmIS1aFbX16yf93GCa5on3sMZtVSFHg0Ih7psKuDim3ovn Kh5LuyiREdOGBDcp8MX/2kihqnz2bbq9UUQCLVmsMxyA+/Wq3/DtztEnpVJXP1GL5ZTy 27XvnETaZR1zrxjHpRJNY9SyDAOAnqIxrIA8VOvBcVIvreHoG4LYm5yf9m0Cos+GrDSO X8TQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=THT0dRB8J3NG1zUuw0aw73MaEfrohr1qae3tBRt114A=; b=eL2yXpNZvQKgMtXSAEAYjjA0+B9SVX7D6bhl1Bjf872Olvu4M6/PxA8OOzoNV+hnhY g+v5V/IUL14nWmT3l4c7yUN7YtntQ1OX+0ZiSReRu/WVYDHfI+rlJYFw+/fdEx+/IXNQ u1RE8dQZGzJTw3UBg25/DlHoLaTw6yh26JugS4DU9LzRya1ZaMb3V4VKwiguKWiFm+iY cxdsfCOCCnb5NTcUVeij+cEoq+EA5vhImBq413D2zNVb7rB6zXWGpiqVsuFoIJbzYS0M F3jcwFixWvhCYviqdq//rFIS70vSlohx7WsWp6VS2RKjE4OKT9rC+yJEKc0chQvnBCyy 0ihg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V24K2zauZhGzWNruVFBbqv2lgEbuyKzbUk111Lmadl3mcpaBW gPQmi0LGqdMkAeAa2x5qsZVOy8qupnLMHM4tdPYX/afw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhOMd83yauWZUobP8KM0yfX59SQN2b78VJOxednZRHGfgWuNgItvtHn2DaSlMxorh71dL9hEMH5QkhDTn7BhE=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d755:: with SMTP id o82mr1429273oig.164.1605473754273; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:55:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202011151920.0AFJKN9U003337@mail2.mwassocs.co.uk> <3d26bffe-b6c9-4ed7-6135-a515f9902fd7@gmail.com> <m1keOTi-0000EGC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1keOTi-0000EGC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:55:42 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2wZkXryhw1u5WAFdtCvXHyyz1zeM22FP_gRxjurjsG-Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Extending a /64
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1daba05b42b7ca5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ME2mNZSB8TZopkQPpkaH-HgfLqw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 20:55:57 -0000

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020, 07:19 Philip Homburg, <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
wrote:

> > Again, there are 35 trillion /48s in 2000::/3. How many would you
> > need?
>
> It gets tight when you want the prefix to contain 39 bits to number around
> half a million planes.
>

Why are half a million planes going to be on the Internet?

Supposedly only some drones needed (really?) to be on the Internet. How did
that turn into every plane?

Can somebody post a link to the draft that tries to justify this idea?

Has a security threat model been done?

>From what I've read here, there seems to be a belief that if the network
firewall checkbox is ticked, all security threats have been addressed.





>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>