Re: [Jmap] Submission

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Wed, 19 April 2017 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394241294B7 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KolDE2fvsVet for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286BD1294BE for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBD9FA0075; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:28:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1492601314; bh=HshSav/bC+ziTobHedILIsFiSvCN2ZWEozihpE+MbiI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z1K3HSl6frfGblJ0Zb8JZ6rs+ZJmJ/MBLIl2eAx0pCLNP+4mtGfVFTGRooieGltB/ zy4/Dww9Up1oJAev2qR6NayTr26VOprm9tn8NQ0qwFU9mKBPav6oCA3YiFD5unucZK DQK9BHqbzUx1xSoHH0br21VAiKSmqoyjE9r9guJQ=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1492601312-4382-4380/11/1; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:28:32 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:28:31 +0100
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 1.0 (jessie)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <7bf6ed88-9277-47fd-8059-1119987522bd@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <em325289ca-eee8-4c74-85de-cb55a2dc5085@bodybag>
References: <em27fa7b29-5584-44f3-aa88-086ce734ab59@bodybag> <1492585876.3100717.948941576.3168BAAE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <em325289ca-eee8-4c74-85de-cb55a2dc5085@bodybag>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/7qi7g0TyiG_n0AKGhVxS7mXLzvo>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:28:38 -0000

Adrien de Croy writes:
> NTP I wouldn't rely on.  I still often see clock divergence.

A lot of phones get their time from the telco, whose base stations are very 
well synchronised with each other but not always with that place in 
Greenwich.

But perhaps it's still reasonable to rely on correctness. If E-Plus is off 
(IIRC it was off by ~90 seconds when I was a customer) its customers either 
cannot undo send and/or can undo for 120 seconds rather than 30. Having 
that happen to a few people may be an acceptable price to pay for API 
simplicity. There are fewer than 1000 network operators, most of those 
<1000 clocks are correct to within a second or two, and the consequences of 
the errors seem minor.

Arnt