IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Tue, 25 April 2017 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1F81319B7 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.718
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=dWb7n7TV; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Aio6+QhK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id feSYhP2SokZC for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 700421318F4 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A9B20A69 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:37:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:37:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=qD7wcZ7hTkeyqTtwq92K8WOQy65dQ WrjStRgNyNhNkc=; b=dWb7n7TV4e5xrdoRQBz6cXfw6iNjpmKZAx8YkOkTLrlcn Dw45v6903gwwPmyAA2gM/sCT979pTcXOlZiuLeYrnr6M8XXP1dRl+WI7k6VyoVWX f0G/Vwvj/CEgJkRnPnYwLut1hepq7ZluZaAmyYloukDcrhObfyRpEowogwSCPblh IHpOlNuvfhbIy4hc+dk9/f+ArADumHuWHLC86Eg0I3HXn36X6xPBW10napT2+J2p HEvK7QDsBXzPZtKPZhDOVcfNHam61Nk9UVswsSNSFaYu43YN+T2SIZFlGTrMd2/W DZfcXGywhWhO9O9DEjVYqwIdGViLj9cITvf+JJDhA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=qD7wcZ 7hTkeyqTtwq92K8WOQy65dQWrjStRgNyNhNkc=; b=Aio6+QhKWvELHIq+2E2RF/ zDgDB6p4duoJYROsBVUijMqHMLcrexi65aa3Yg8vbgO5f5ZtVHJyBOmMcN2i0DyW Jn/Kg37Dp2yaxtaLnGKE0gfodoxr/NpfHIgtHeesyM7dNHqubKVbZcrdH5TqMzb4 7S5qBUWCOMwm9qeoHXST2GZwaKR2PkO+VqCc3LoXnEkw318CyOPRkNPCD+rgHV5p Oy6Q663eCNVcUk41LpslSpfr7Lvy1ryiU+iKxXtV3tJNomtxkZUpmxBbLK/QjqY5 HjHg3RdH96tW/e7EcQJY+cd9vAW7WdnfWtIXaCndyLJBkiuGEJEmJewTEy3fVqMA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:k-D-WGQlQcA1Pcblc7JAULSxA8mmzoEq7KAJ2Dh8pfpgHK-S4AO1OQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id BD713BAB6F; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:37:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1493098643.3019530.955182168.23368BB4@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
To: jmap@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_149309864330195300"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-29d47332
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:37:23 +1000
References: <1492996915.3310412.953749536.0F1C8B46@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170424014957.39235.qmail@ary.lan> <emb951e04d-3dc9-4244-915b-21bd272245ff@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704240925190.68584@ary.qy> <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <DB03A7F421F2B9E4A8C6AD1D@caldav.corp.apple.com> <6319482c-e53f-4483-870b-844e23030f8c@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <A9622742-D931-4975-9572-04878949EDDE@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <A9622742-D931-4975-9572-04878949EDDE@fugue.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/gde0CPc--oJG4s3v_6b5Z8frj7M>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:37:27 -0000

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, at 05:25, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen
> <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:>> However, the question that I understood was asked upthread is roughly
>> "to which recipients has x been delivered already?", and for that
>> particular question an unbroken implementation chain is needed from
>> sender to recipient.> 
> I think even knowing that the MTA for the admin domain of the JMAP
> server has successfully forwarded the message would be sufficient to
> be equivalent in most cases.   If someone does more, that's great, but
> best is the enemy of good enough.
Our eventual plan for FastMail is to annotate every sent message with
the delivery log lines that were generated for each recipient at the
edge of our infrastructure as the messages get sent.  Self service
facilities are nice to have.
Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana
  brong@fastmail.fm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email