IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard

"Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Fri, 21 April 2017 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <adrien@qbik.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DAE1293E8 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8C_NsYgFvJy for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.qbik.com (smtp.qbik.com [122.56.26.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A438129407 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From [192.168.1.146] (unverified [192.168.1.146]) by SMTP Server [192.168.1.3] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v9.0.5 (Build 5926)) with SMTP id <0001026425@smtp.qbik.com>; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 10:52:29 +1200
From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:52:30 +0000
Message-Id: <embbc99f95-a227-447d-9731-60bcb5a02ddf@bodybag>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704211843530.56587@ary.qy>
References: <BC098A22-2837-4316-822A-27232A896EF1@fugue.com> <20170421151636.28173.qmail@ary.lan> <em9926309f-c4d3-41e7-8016-dcbda8fcbd73@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704211843530.56587@ary.qy>
Reply-To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.0.27943.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/Y3s5X8Y5i6Ht-L9P7QnoO9eGLDk>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:52:36 -0000

It's only vapourware if nobody implements it.

MUA designers tend to be interested in things like usability.

Adrien

------ Original Message ------
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
Sent: 22/04/2017 10:46:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard

>>>Finally, if people want to try whizbang ways to show animations of
>>>mail zipping through the aether, that sounds like a swell optional
>>>add-on to try and implement and test and perhaps bring back later as
>>>an extension, but it'd be nuts to try to invent it now.
>>>
>>IME, if we don't design it now, it will never happen.  Surely it's 
>>important enough to do the work up front?
>
>If our goal is to drag JMAP down in an endless swamp of vaporware 
>design, I'd entirely agree.  Otherwise, no.
>
>R's,
>John
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jmap mailing list
>Jmap@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email