Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3ED1294BD for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_N5rRjmbIC5 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE350128B88 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y33so122789306qta.2 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Yp8gsH0YI03UvRvyH3Gwy+ORxHrj2b6X1l+WnOREzYs=; b=KuRNqHNnVElEbXphzc0whAwEB8SzZMKEKQHAs+5UEduLyapBu+7VYtGjrAcDVGAyQF JK0exmJeKvQJb/nU0MkgnpN0+paYJWBw4wyVurdDAlVF0+cY3bbwIMKoRyVjH+9IWM2u EN+TVycsJqpTUr+MetbQwtTfc4QxCunHYIv7epLBlXDn5tMtpl+wEf4wf9ojjZMw/hes Jdb4xoxKto9xmo/KYr/qVtKp/sdzqybYLt2cDmhQEPgPwuSla0aV9it4anRwmuHn1ZTK o5cvKuk8MJlZHqw1ZHb1PLc1W2Y82izqrv6Ud78BqNfu+pd3dmcD0ONRbSCEfkaNcgCi PT9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Yp8gsH0YI03UvRvyH3Gwy+ORxHrj2b6X1l+WnOREzYs=; b=FZhINfaHCQnxUIaQrCTYbVh83t2T2rI4cYD8tTsDMfiRU6cLx8rvvgSAnN1kTeIakM DYvL4j4EUnWs63Un+3SsjdBho/MNu/RAwLftvO26Tz2jXIYYjggoDD6XQP5rFLLxbQbn RmbWZRQVUNtzSO0fn2fur1IvuciS8mUWTtj3VU3Qz7RU7N6vTe0oma4ReC/4iL4+WQMC Cd/BUJ+q/E4S5X57YNmrhvXde0ORogbymhZ1FofudKRUN/6FtShCx7Fg8yerEYW4ImZu r2v1a9aFbDtBjtcr3gZxKVRQrqc0Ssd+9583kJK2EskJ/MKsw2w0pMbdsmsZ4urC9Uly 0p/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6BkwmDsOJ60mwx4LwF9BQKuO6l8JEeQ9X47xLXYBKUf7wDqiy8 0nVgRkkF7nXA8xtMQ3Y=
X-Received: by 10.200.53.66 with SMTP id z2mr26860526qtb.184.1493061941745; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-pro-6.home.arpa (pool-108-31-94-75.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.31.94.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n22sm2665399qkn.8.2017.04.24.12.25.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <A9622742-D931-4975-9572-04878949EDDE@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F998A8B4-45DC-4036-89C6-63B12C032346"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:25:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6319482c-e53f-4483-870b-844e23030f8c@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, jmap@ietf.org
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <1492996915.3310412.953749536.0F1C8B46@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170424014957.39235.qmail@ary.lan> <emb951e04d-3dc9-4244-915b-21bd272245ff@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704240925190.68584@ary.qy> <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <DB03A7F421F2B9E4A8C6AD1D@caldav.corp.apple.com> <6319482c-e53f-4483-870b-844e23030f8c@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/h2JE9rMAhktw4vqtkGNzf4TTe7Q>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:25:44 -0000

On Apr 24, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:
> However, the question that I understood was asked upthread is roughly "to which recipients has x been delivered already?", and for that particular question an unbroken implementation chain is needed from sender to recipient.

I think even knowing that the MTA for the admin domain of the JMAP server has successfully forwarded the message would be sufficient to be equivalent in most cases.   If someone does more, that's great, but best is the enemy of good enough.