IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 22 April 2017 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AF4126DD9 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7WBnXbzRMIx for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64B612025C for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f76so3945028qke.2 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=iZQkAMzeLJyQHCVGni2pp6MPX7iIX/9LnF40WYII2SA=; b=a8a8LlhtirsLysOolS1wjXZcyVArlCE8VNd7Axu03GLf2If/qGuTneCVQCtjFNaW5u /UqBBX2NJuw89jGsSLaOHqMuO6EEVPQkMhqrJwgfIFHBa28Bil34QWJlmezNNk6AY3pi P9MLnIZcw/6+TthN3Guca3kh12J6z1ZwOqBw9o6FQ+UCUFxN/X0rLhq1lY2p2my6WxNd 9HYDrMPzJtHhAiDKLBeSMvRxM6/9fZJqMUH9ee7aECGRI1PDvooa+LHgHfKMHN0VjwGb V4nz4t8GkNl5YgpS4F9GSay/k0WGaK54C/g/b8q7hvdPA8xh0QvupB9xXltIoIW8R+j1 uHhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=iZQkAMzeLJyQHCVGni2pp6MPX7iIX/9LnF40WYII2SA=; b=uFdvaCvB6m/j3Y8fCDVMICSf0D4e8oN+lTKQgDxW529iisW/3JmaRFHHlNvbOInHDo OlDzTG7Ld/+6+5ybhkCaK7akfd2zzfvGzaX6aA109i5gIZGOPPpV3a2slMiVSh/Km+Ua uDsxB5ut0deTOtn5Ogd0t7gKQ5gKkZAfbh/QOo8Ejl6GvRkbY7Fa3iNZ8Rx4HL9DNmac HlkkE/MXS5k9WrAaAhRVF7j5pCLccuK/E8aHHKhZlxDw13X/y5MBbIpYCYIbJSPHDGPs RBsnNA0aOUiNPl96rDisOJnbjoheWd9cEpMw0x0oBA6mR8Nq9MH8gudT2JIPxeizA7pC glRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5YaUv8vt8d5OfUif5EDQ+YCCZ/OuhrRwZGhBPeoujy9mi37NeF GXzByQRdYisgGyEaBew=
X-Received: by 10.55.65.133 with SMTP id o127mr15513040qka.71.1492827411683; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t129sm7660123qkf.36.2017.04.21.19.16.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <2409CB86-1C1B-417B-9934-B969180C714F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F60CF2BA-7003-4F38-B63F-35635729AE4D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:16:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <77D58FD6-0D09-424E-8EEF-5C6738BAD6A4@oracle.com>
Cc: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, jmap@ietf.org
To: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
References: <20170419163429.8556.qmail@ary.lan> <87d1c873cf.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704191353500.43511@ary.qy> <01QDEV2QM6XC00005O@mauve.mrochek.com> <BC098A22-2837-4316-822A-27232A896EF1@fugue.com> <4471fa93-2321-4a7e-87b0-fbb00927d584@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <77D58FD6-0D09-424E-8EEF-5C6738BAD6A4@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/zAc_VYfpCu-8h_EfsjO3iPYO_-A>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:16:54 -0000

On Apr 21, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com> wrote:
> My product's existing JMAP-like proxy is a JSON/HTTP to submission/IMAP proxy. One of the design errors that was made (back in the 1990s) was to not support submission extensions. This is one of the largest remaining design errors in our proxy and has caused significant problems. I do not want the JMAP standard to repeat the mistake we made.

Can you give an example of a failure mode that resulted from this omission?  (Not doubting you, just curious what the specific problem was).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email