IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

"Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Sat, 22 April 2017 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <adrien@qbik.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1042E129484 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5Bsj6WlpMdY for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.qbik.com (smtp.qbik.com [122.56.26.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E277128708 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From [192.168.1.146] (unverified [192.168.1.146]) by SMTP Server [192.168.1.3] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v9.0.5 (Build 5926)) with SMTP id <0001026463@smtp.qbik.com>; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:28:13 +1200
From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 00:28:14 +0000
Message-Id: <em3dab458f-b6a5-4017-995c-651030981e3a@bodybag>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704212009210.56890@ary.qy>
References: <emc8d121a7-bfae-4074-8de0-9716d42f680b@bodybag> <20170421231922.29225.qmail@ary.lan> <emba044018-431d-44cf-af93-4f12e5fecc29@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704212009210.56890@ary.qy>
Reply-To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.0.27943.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/Fh1aIBcDNdY4PRgVUMhE0zObL-M>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 00:28:20 -0000

I'm not suggesting a walled garden.

I'm suggesting that eventually SMTP can become the true relic it is.

We've had decades to fix SMTP.  It's not happening.  Especially when 
protocol designers don't seem to care about user experience beyond basic 
interop.

we can add extensions to SMTP until the cows come home.  We could build 
all these things into SMTP (and maybe we should attempt to).  But the 
legacy issues will continue to hamper it, until we decide to make a 
clean break from them (e.g. like deprecating non binary transport in 
SMTP).  We're moving too slowly, and the users are already voting with 
their feet.

------ Original Message ------
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
Sent: 22/04/2017 12:09:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission

>>I'm imagining a system where the JMAP server uses JMAP to send it the 
>>next hop as well if required, and so on, thereby avoiding the 
>>limitations of SMTP.
>
>Well, then, have fun in your walled garden.
>
>Regards,
>John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
>Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. 
>https://jl.ly
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jmap mailing list
>Jmap@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email