IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 21 April 2017 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B824129B15 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=IJ2Q1+ia; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=eeAapSAs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KuZoKhjrRfoI for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46293129AE8 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71682 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2017 22:46:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=11800.58fa8bcd.k1704; bh=FQ2Kg+DMusjGca+YjDX6wTsyFuPv3O/OrCGSp3AnKtw=; b=IJ2Q1+iaCNtXJVqW/6w5PwCjI61E54HEpbtu5xp0N4Bk9aB4QvrhiXIf8fw3gSbMN+1/hzQk8wixtAkeumlZCrCAtOXAEi7HEeJ6Fjbn+uBpHDWybHxWmzeEReqEuUGSstdSjRucVZX9Q3Vm47HcbsZwrkqFAD36BznKyhU81k/tsZ9qhFUHg3Vt71TUwbIfXYgDAeRDMLFgL3u5b0407QK6KrkCP9Xu6zcLY5ztDfDxEVfRg8tKajwPif/ftuIs
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=11800.58fa8bcd.k1704; bh=FQ2Kg+DMusjGca+YjDX6wTsyFuPv3O/OrCGSp3AnKtw=; b=eeAapSAsU2cK05qmFhIvH9toJuTwp9UUTZYxyqEyfzl8K+i07jo+i3yhI43dRgwgFk8itA835jxPn3my4+NjKlRrcmAPtt7tFF/3cntwi9DSDXnrGH3t63a6dxQygxjsg98w+xSAIlxq3kkrY62oL3qLEtzJVniCgzo/SxHYpUnj5OPFrZzS6y3B+RbPm/Alcm/r/7HFGGRgV+tyygZiCvZpRsjo1bVMVZ8IOV8v4BA4q/fHSpHr0lEID6a06w6B
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 21 Apr 2017 22:46:37 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:46:36 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704211843530.56587@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <em9926309f-c4d3-41e7-8016-dcbda8fcbd73@bodybag>
References: <BC098A22-2837-4316-822A-27232A896EF1@fugue.com> <20170421151636.28173.qmail@ary.lan> <em9926309f-c4d3-41e7-8016-dcbda8fcbd73@bodybag>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (OSX 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/y2RuUxSE7WD4SUjx8O58uBtBOfo>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission is not hard
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:46:40 -0000

>> Finally, if people want to try whizbang ways to show animations of
>> mail zipping through the aether, that sounds like a swell optional
>> add-on to try and implement and test and perhaps bring back later as
>> an extension, but it'd be nuts to try to invent it now.
>> 
> IME, if we don't design it now, it will never happen.  Surely it's important 
> enough to do the work up front?

If our goal is to drag JMAP down in an endless swamp of vaporware design, 
I'd entirely agree.  Otherwise, no.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email