IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Mon, 24 April 2017 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419D312943B for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hfQRv3HD8jeW for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB39131675 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F40B6AD623C; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:25:39 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5XDHbpmXfvvM; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:25:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.44.178.52]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6169F6AD6231; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:25:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:25:36 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, jmap@ietf.org
Message-ID: <DB03A7F421F2B9E4A8C6AD1D@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <1492996915.3310412.953749536.0F1C8B46@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170424014957.39235.qmail@ary.lan> <emb951e04d-3dc9-4244-915b-21bd272245ff@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704240925190.68584@ary.qy> <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0b1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="835"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/XaCZIJmxFupttNWaL9wuaEkw-FI>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:25:41 -0000

Hi Arnt,

--On April 24, 2017 at 3:16:13 PM +0100 Arnt Gulbrandsen 
<arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:

> 3885/7, isn't it? Would be nice if etc., but twelve years of
> nonimplementation is a strong sign that it isn't going to be implemented.
> IMO JMAP draft editors ought to pretend that 3885-8 never were written
> and nothing of the sort will be deployed.

At least one person has commented on this list that they have implemented 
the extension. Just because an extension is not implemented by every SMTP 
server, it doesn't mean that the extension is not useful and being used in 
some smaller market. Clearly we don't need to build message tracking into 
JMAP from the outset, but equally we should not design JMAP in a way that 
would prevent it from easily being added as an extension for those that 
want it.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email