IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 20 April 2017 03:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE82129C0C for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JmcYBrZ1MOVy for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8321012940C for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c45so35572321qtb.1 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=DQ5WmHm4uCTSg72BkKdme5dDWxylYu2exMcVNQW+2Hk=; b=Ka2HYpI09aAoCIWb30GAqiKHqAUFPvFTY6izvu12DJ6yce4fallZZZiogsCkLzrWhY gL+6zFvIJi8nKhJ/gqMWUVAs79W2l+yahloKsGl14GeQQG0DeT1ed2A21JJz8VR5PeAl SMts8jPFiY5RNLgd+7nmtZcQnrx2D884UrJ9Gga+xK7RrPdqjeXWn/ZtADn0b+JxbRXD IN1PWW4Mx97KnwwmaNFPKux17+EhII8uTeGOfGv7Vlg8YI2nl74sWXcnpOE++ZpBtfv9 kCGjmbFqyrPbDT1wkWsH6cInWr5guaGp6lm1Ja5bpmHhLQai6UYlAF/C8w+mEs6bi1I1 q2ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=DQ5WmHm4uCTSg72BkKdme5dDWxylYu2exMcVNQW+2Hk=; b=Hs15cujL1KJe4iwVILQRnh0UHIYabsxUVrARUk95fCdTv4xsNezuUO/xF82o6LMZEd CFcmsCT5DvTpoyPl8RBgFQ9qUDIdgZEae7C4PNq6JYWc3FZz9aVqcKsj21vwWpaa35b2 RavuKTtMCuY1GKgTUklAWHAgQALcXMkTjK4s2unsloOsNs5BQoUhCvGt5xu3B3JPqdh8 KW92LNf01kp2rD/qNB+wkZyGfNYlE9oOxEW0uhT/sEp2NX73kAvkrm3UmoOVLgbk+qlN RDqaOa2Y1r7PJvCnFWKX5zhQR+uKcuNCJcUr7u8JlRReYSvbQJzrAP839ODfpWuPitNZ Ix1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4okDtjd9xLIqf0PRKhMAAntY0nD1ZFdXkbvechEtpHO6B4N8g4 7ldfEIMu0P9yRa4b5V4=
X-Received: by 10.200.34.39 with SMTP id o36mr6419535qto.189.1492659069650; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.202] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm3352817qtb.25.2017.04.19.20.31.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <FE64AF98-AE3A-4A04-83F4-A9B97ABF316D@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_043E5C4E-E427-42D8-A6EC-FD2B8F14A209"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:31:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <C86E9BC4-757F-4903-9EE5-2D9C099B5BE1@oracle.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
To: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
References: <em27fa7b29-5584-44f3-aa88-086ce734ab59@bodybag> <096E2D4B-D7ED-4439-BB6F-7944892D2ACA@oracle.com> <89E217B2-A700-498C-BA72-3FD9939F34C7@fugue.com> <C987AD7A-84F0-4400-B418-77C58C0827C9@oracle.com> <A0FCE54A-8AFA-4267-9567-A218A12F1AAD@fugue.com> <C86E9BC4-757F-4903-9EE5-2D9C099B5BE1@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/kOKNit8EBB7wolghZw6ry_LwM6U>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 03:31:12 -0000

On Apr 19, 2017, at 10:30 PM, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com> wrote:
> Improved bounce handling could make a good JMAP extension.

That is the rathole IMAP went down.   The reason I'm advocating for doing this in the base spec is that then we don't have to tolerate clients that don't do the extension.   But the complexities that you mention are worth consideration—I'm saying this not to entirely disagree with you, but to advocate that we at least consider doing this in the base spec.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email