IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 20 April 2017 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27E2129537 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ia-GeMM585wC for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3D7129548 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y63so17105661qkd.1 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=9acegeZMADAdSNREniKURgt23rHYd5rNAfJMbujWCmU=; b=b4dVGGxEnDiz/UvRzGOfBqEKWMT+XZtOhFUBI86YT5+/Vn+chVt0YP/rAOSaFKD9x+ E48U3d7t7M/AvQ4f+M4OEByXIscFlBARHv5ZFJYERD4M7ZFcy4ApHPXHx9rCmFfLHHWJ vU9tj/Xx7HXKf+DspgoUqujprTQbXUdirV2WNPSVOnTJCL/tCq8Vs9A9U3Bya5SUH5Qa tn/FenWlvYMU00RcHsfZLK9w4YFnyhQ7SAMIiUQGGZ+kEDpAiLAhmkyjdjSUr1PWHUi7 0ALkx4b/i9YIU1I2UqvtQkkRIMImDuIDkSzPAYv/U1O50tLTE5srnABQeyj+4dZRmv5u dcuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=9acegeZMADAdSNREniKURgt23rHYd5rNAfJMbujWCmU=; b=Rj1aEwWoMCukMWkTRhVCuwVTxT6G9fv1WTry8g5EZRGkV+DjMzMTibCdDJTaYGdZrg +u6I2w+vd6RynqByUod2Bjt6VWhXMNwLVSPwds0MPRXqdWvie0KNjq03zgS236+GcpJ9 fCu6b59gquCEyeRmguBJAKJJjjufUEelG6mDanzUlC8mTrvniCPJKTzfQ4rMaFSj6X3s xePzbkKdyeFEaL92q8QdIbVcXsRf6VEYUORKRS1JBomCCO7qGt9gpkKnbNjHkmrL1qw9 0JhS/UKIoDgaILWPDkPQO38q3spSRTAoclmXKK6InVGNg7Gv31Um78RXBe7jc8uFzdiY D7Rw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/41HjCkES02zd8b4v+PQycKJ/QXAUZPSUYKvvQASeecuuuHc6lo B4ELt/9jyOV1bQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.20.161 with SMTP id 33mr5164585qku.321.1492697893169; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t45sm2605235qtt.9.2017.04.20.07.18.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <38570AF7-DC45-4F12-AB78-F2E6C41ECC53@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1FCE6475-E461-4402-8D51-3D34ACC11B18"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:18:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6vZ3g4zXtHUSYTnqrKZXZrz_kcHiHLpFeytY7t5cNeJsA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
To: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
References: <em27fa7b29-5584-44f3-aa88-086ce734ab59@bodybag> <096E2D4B-D7ED-4439-BB6F-7944892D2ACA@oracle.com> <89E217B2-A700-498C-BA72-3FD9939F34C7@fugue.com> <B1563B04-AA25-47CA-9D63-D8B6CD4B3257@isode.com> <AECE5A39-67D9-4D92-8E82-DBB8F0C572D3@oracle.com> <CABa8R6vZ3g4zXtHUSYTnqrKZXZrz_kcHiHLpFeytY7t5cNeJsA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/bBLG4bheEH3WWMknfbvzjoZ2PyQ>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:18:16 -0000

On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:36 AM, Brandon Long <blong@google.com> wrote:
> I often considered something like that for Gmail, as it eliminates the confusion people often have that a message may be pending in our mail queues for days.  It does require a fairly integrated system, however.

That seems like a good thing.   In any case, if the facility is present in the spec and is the standard way that MUAs communicate about messages, then whether or not this integration happens really comes down to quality of implementation.   If integration is possible, the UX will be better; if it is not, it will still be perfectly adequate.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email