Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67271315AE for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mnv66jNBICgr for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14F81315DC for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64601 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2017 14:51:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 24 Apr 2017 14:51:38 -0000
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:51:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20170424145116.42134.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Cc: arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no
In-Reply-To: <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/q1fj-kMErAZDV080GIRMJOyVq54>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:53:32 -0000

In article <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no> you write:
>John R Levine writes:
>> Once again, that's a change to SMTP and in this case a fairly 
>> large and incompatible one.
>
>3885/7, isn't it? Would be nice if etc., but twelve years of 
>nonimplementation is a strong sign that it isn't going to be implemented. 

That, and the relief we all felt when default configs of sendmail
stopped sending those messages saying I've been trying for N hours and
will keep trying for a long, long, time.

R's,
John