IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944CA129BCC for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FVOUdccSLk7T for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB2A12D0C3 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y63so554384qkd.1 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=lHW9TMhr5S1Zq6HoDTjQc1RBjyGpTpUcnjkxezjv8WA=; b=o04I2RAoxmVJXY+9S1PrRFAPpN6sFXsyITWRmF739n8VYibITY4XlbfzQsxoiF6mQH FZv7sU4R9lrKgU9DxsbJasutF13UfexGIuk2haIdAO5xNBmFTaPtBtKqAyH/5qh+ZhzC h/gc/JOYiKjWR/JPsCV6kgAjlIyLcFMRoKqv12Of7Sn0yxnMoNrhjSBr1teil5FRMsMh mkL31ARZJ2BblDBAcbNSvfVLMYOI5nPdCo79xCA2BvOozJpcY9Uv+Yz4dY/CijXE09gp MXiAaEWvr3CFCXTxC70afyRzlKEoP5Nnv1Foc8nRrMv5JgBAWBjGSs88E1MzrWKBH8tI jZWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=lHW9TMhr5S1Zq6HoDTjQc1RBjyGpTpUcnjkxezjv8WA=; b=s6Wrb0Eyavi+QBSsSsRYngwPdlFHYLzuqqqUDPyg7lyunx/oTq4ohaICVxF0Ror9qd yE3Ma0OB9h8FH9fAlhbWh79VXE5MPaBQEQIp4MdEdvO9Z9ryfX+G9iGoDCQPHm9/2rWD +Xaxr7QeA2VfJSfqapfRhUGtORqWYWupySjXTLLaCSEaABY3P24vg0ohHh6d7zdLpb9f BEPWIaTilSqSlwjG0Lv5i9+RO0dvd0YmoJNxEnwC2jBkiz1aZssSg9I6GPC7UdrUeWzX /KVsKWC4hS5+hBZMZveGT3tSs7JMSfJWLUI2kpPg4MPC8fZEwq4OsosdzO5sdhVXIVrx GWDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7q+zfvfugehYJNdm+uqzIYKTKqbSdQFu+pWz1cDclmG2yVG9ep Qb3zj/cnA/PiyYU515k=
X-Received: by 10.55.129.134 with SMTP id c128mr4217080qkd.310.1492634968549; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.202] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm2679164qkd.56.2017.04.19.13.49.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <58623A09-E856-46D7-92A3-E960E20245F0@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_051165E9-A9B5-42F6-838A-E60D771F404B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:49:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <B1563B04-AA25-47CA-9D63-D8B6CD4B3257@isode.com>
Cc: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>, "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <em27fa7b29-5584-44f3-aa88-086ce734ab59@bodybag> <096E2D4B-D7ED-4439-BB6F-7944892D2ACA@oracle.com> <89E217B2-A700-498C-BA72-3FD9939F34C7@fugue.com> <B1563B04-AA25-47CA-9D63-D8B6CD4B3257@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/qaz76CuDuWBuLhgQ6GTypbeAilM>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:49:33 -0000

On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> Can you elaborate on why you think MUA has to watch the Sent mailbox? In order to report to the user that a message was sent? I suspect we can use JMAP notifications for that.

Possibly, but reliable delivery of notifications would potentially be an issue, for cases where the message is queued rather than being delivered as soon as it lands, or even in that case if the MUA disconnects immediately after submitting.   But my mental model of how notifications work is really thin, so if that's not an issue, then sure, notifications would work.   I would have assumed that watching the sent mailbox would be how the notification would be generated, no?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email